From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1RzvCs-0001t4-4q for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:16:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzvCq-0001rv-Bd for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:16:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzvCk-0002ND-Cp for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:16:56 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:43923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzvCk-0002N9-7I for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:16:50 -0500 Received: by eaag11 with SMTP id g11so2872386eaa.0 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:16:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.20.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.213.20.8; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.20.8 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phcoder@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=phcoder@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.213.20.8]) by 10.213.20.8 with SMTP id d8mr3935580ebb.79.1329851809458 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:16:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rTVeosNE0ByDEcqkeya231pD+Y1lzRknY59lz1BYhnU=; b=N2eAsQmbqX+zEoTsboJbsfYq/zbGva8HtlEZmoOkpEwibpGowXlNgBuj5b/A44yJCe QQB8HYcQ4EkIFGJZucNg0Sf3nQXD39R87KOfOKkeKSiScXLHl62/u2gj4sOCXoUFttWd l5HTEdzcPs6lYG7R8wniOrtXi1LAzqXwxLyIs= Received: by 10.213.20.8 with SMTP id d8mr3122743ebb.79.1329851809374; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:16:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (85-234.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.197.234.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v51sm93260482eef.2.2012.02.21.11.16.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:16:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F43ED9C.9070700@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:16:44 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: disable-libzfs configure flag (Re: Freeze on 27 February) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:16:57 -0000 On 21.02.2012 20:04, Mike Gilbert wrote: > 2012/2/21 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko: >> Hello, it's to announce that from 27th of February the GRUB will be frozen >> for 2.00 release. From that date on, no new features will be committed only >> bugfixes. >> If you have a patch which you think should be included in 2.00 you can ping >> me about it but I might answer that it's postponed after 2.00 > It would be really great if you would reconsider the --disable-libzfs > flag that was proposed a few weeks ago. It was on my todo list to comment on it. The main problem is that it's not in line with other configure options: it has to be enable/disable and show the result in the status message (see e.g. SDL support) -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko