All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
To: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Cc: Sangwook Lee <sangwook.lee@linaro.org>,
	samsung@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: ARM: Exynos: Mismatch in BogoMIPS values
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:37:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F448633.5050101@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9yfHz9e5iEu=3ay0F_WVLeg=+6CtErqX2G4zq7Me+QtJSPWQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/22/2012 11:01 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The mismatch in BogoMIPS value between two cores (992 and 1992) is not
> specific to Origen board.
> The same is observed on SMDKV310 board as well. It looks like a common
> Exynos machine problem.
> 
> Including the mailing list for wider dissemination.
> 
While bisecting, I found that this problem came in between 3.0 and
3.1-rc1. I could not do much bisecting beyond that as the kernel doesn't
boot at many of the intermediate locations between them.

> 
> On 21/02/2012, Sangwook Lee <sangwook.lee@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Maybe, someone missed this.
> [snip]
> 
>>
>> On a side note, with linaro 3.1, when you cat /proc/cpuinfo, we get
>> incorrect numbers for the BOGOMIPS for the 2 cores (900 and 1900),
>> whereas on 3.0.4+ kernel, and the insignal kernel, we get the correct
>> report of 1900 for both cores.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Tushar Behera

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-22  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-22  5:31 ARM: Exynos: Mismatch in BogoMIPS values Sachin Kamat
2012-02-22  6:07 ` Tushar Behera [this message]
2012-02-22  6:42 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-22  9:15   ` Sachin Kamat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F448633.5050101@linaro.org \
    --to=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
    --cc=samsung@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=sangwook.lee@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.