From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Justin Ossevoort <justin@internetionals.nl>
Subject: Re: brtfs on top of dmcrypt with SSD. No corruption iff write cache
 off?
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:28:13 +0100
Message-ID: <4F44C33D.4020605@internetionals.nl>
References: <20120202124241.GW16796@shiny> <20120202152722.GI12429@merlins.org> <20120130003754.GD4380@merlins.org> <20120201175624.GE16796@shiny> <20120202032345.GB31903@merlins.org> <20120212223242.GA31989@merlins.org> <4F384FAA.5060506@redhat.com> <20120213001400.GD31989@merlins.org> <1329320563.1897.6.camel@ayu> <20120215165540.GC4763@merlins.org> <20120215165918.GA17761@carfax.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120215165918.GA17761@carfax.org.uk>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 15/02/12 17:59, Hugo Mills wrote:
>    It's a "temporary" location (6 months and counting) while
> kernel.org is static-pages-only.
> 
>    Hugo.
> 

Couldn't btrfs.wiki.kernel.org be made a CNAME for btrfs.ipv5.de for the
time being until kernel.org is up and running?
Or alternatively all requests could be
proxied/frame-forwarded/redirected (in order of preference, to make sure
everybody keeps using the original url as much as possible) to
btrfs.ipv5.de?

Kernel.org is a complex site and I can easily foresee them having to
spent months still fixing/hardening all of it's internals and backends
before getting around to these "extra" project facilities.

Regards,

    justin....