From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S0CJd-0001qR-2O for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:33:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0CJV-0001Xv-LN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:33:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0CJN-0006XR-ET for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:32:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:32773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0CJN-0006XC-99 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:32:49 -0500 Received: by eekc13 with SMTP id c13so3255187eek.0 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.8.68 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.213.8.68; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.8.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phcoder@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=phcoder@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.213.8.68]) by 10.213.8.68 with SMTP id g4mr4890603ebg.90.1329917568469 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:32:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ea8PstfypeUuDPuj5APDYVixT2cY2vDO+lFX4i8YRwg=; b=IEmeNNCEtjPomrxNdl2yuLAU6tas8nb62NyLs4ZyDwWHJCfkZb7m688GyeorOIZRLk rUdVrf+DVH1ajrjINjKX0ILAMyKx0t9/NY7Ma9Zs0vIZFqfXNtKA/BjBx6Xm3udurt2u 1gSICINoisA5ONSJLQNetRfiFD6HkPorARjeY= Received: by 10.213.8.68 with SMTP id g4mr3899115ebg.90.1329917568330; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (77-234.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.197.234.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y14sm73355068eef.10.2012.02.22.05.32.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:32:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F44EE79.6040309@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:32:41 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timothy Wang , The development of GRUB 2 Subject: Re: GNU GRUB pxe.mod missing with efi References: <20120215-093605.sv87125.27686@savannah.gnu.org> <4F3B8D6A.9070003@gmail.com> <4F3CB81F.9040709@gmail.com> <4F3CCC77.2000008@gmail.com> <4F44C6BE.2090600@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.83.41 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:33:02 -0000 Keep the list CC'ed. On 22.02.2012 14:24, Timothy Wang wrote: > grub_dl_resolove_symbols gives me a "error: symbol 'grub_checkkey' not > found" > This means that core and module version mismatches > The arp problem is harder to explain. > I have three network cards in my computer > the ethernet I am using is the second one. > Grub keep listening on the first network card > so the arp response can never be receive. > I believe.... GRUB listens on all cards. If not it's a bug which isn't solved by skipping. > > Thank you > > Tim > > > 2012/2/22 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > > > Please keep the list CC'ed > > On 22.02.2012 11:11, Timothy Wang wrote: > > Dear Vladimir Serbinenko, > > There is a bug in the bzr. > Suppose to be after ver 3940 > in dl.c function grub_dl_resolove_sumbols > the function still checks for the old name grub_checkkey. > > I don't see what you mean, this function doesn't check for anything > > Also, for the arp problem I asked before. > in net.c function grub_net_poll_cards in FOR_NET_CARDS > the loop requires > if( card -> num_ifaces == 0 ) > continue; > to skip card without interfaces. > > Why? We poll them to see if we get any packet useful in the future > (e.g. DHCP or SLAAC broadcast)-- Regards Vladimir > 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > > -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko