From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v5] can/usb: Add PEAK-System PCAN USB adapters driver Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:40:33 +0100 Message-ID: <4F451A81.4070009@hartkopp.net> References: <1329481458-2586-1-git-send-email-s.grosjean@peak-system.com> <4F44939D.9050703@hartkopp.net> <4F44998B.3040302@hartkopp.net> <4F450777.3010301@peak-system.com> <4F451161.3020803@hartkopp.net> <4F4518CF.6070207@peak-system.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.161]:40402 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751882Ab2BVQkz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:40:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F4518CF.6070207@peak-system.com> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephane Grosjean Cc: linux-can Mailing List On 22.02.2012 17:33, Stephane Grosjean wrote: > Le 22/02/2012 17:01, Oliver Hartkopp a =E9crit : >=20 >> Pls try the following: >> >> PC1: >> can0 -> usb-pro ch1 ----+ >> can1 -> usb-pro ch2 -+ | >> can2 -> usb ---------+ | >> | | 1Mpbs >> PC2: | | >> can0 -> pcmcia ch1 --+ | >> can1 -> pcmcia ch2 -----+ >> >> PC1: >> cangen -g0 -i can0 >> cangen -g0 -i can1 >> candump any >> >> PC2: >> cangen -g0 -i can0 >> cangen -g0 -i can1 >> candump any >> >> and then pull the usb-pro from PC1 ... >> >> That's really unfriendly 8-) >=20 >=20 > Ok, I found another cable and set up your tesbed: now the usb-pro is = pulled > and both "candump" always are displaying data sent by "cangen can0" f= rom PC2 > and read from pcan-usb on PC1... Both drivers can be removed without = any problem. cangen can0 only on PC2? pls put the cangen on PC2 _and_ PC1 as shown above. >> >> Please check this use-case above. And when it works with your fixed = driver you >> can probalby check the 'old' v5 version to see if you can follow my = bug report >> on your setup. >=20 > ??? > I'm sorry I don't understand what you mean: why should I check the v5= version? Didn't you write that you made some changes before the test?? > And what is (to) "follow your bug report on my setup" ??? I just wanted to make sure that you can see the same effect with your s= etup that i had with version 5. Regards, Oliver