From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0UPd-0005Hf-BI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:52:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0UPZ-0003hQ-0O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:52:29 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0UPY-0003hM-PZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:52:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4F45FE45.2060906@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:52:21 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F45F6C7.6010000@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "qemu -device ?" segfaults List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 02/23/12 09:23, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 February 2012 08:20, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> $subject says all, which pretty much breaks libvirt-managed qemu ... > > Does http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/142548/ fix this for you? Yes. thanks, Gerd