Re: [PATCH] hvm: Correct RTC time offset update error due to tm->tm_year

[annie li <annie.li@oracle.com>]

On 2012-2-23 22:52, annie li wrote:
>
>
> On 2012-2-22 21:58, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>
>> Yes, this looks plausible to me (although I'm no expert on this code).
>> Something similar happens in rtc_next_second.
>> Perhaps it would be better to add a function or macro to do the
>> conversion, such that it is somewhat self documenting? Or at least make
>> the 1900 a #define with a suitable name.
>>   
> I changed the 1900 to a macro and added a new function get_year. The 
> new patch is attached.
Sorry, two macro define: epoch_year and get_year.

Thanks
Annie

                {