From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Raphael Prevost <raphael@buro.asia>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:47:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F46DE35.60503@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120223235450.GA22345@kroah.com>
On 02/23/2012 03:54 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:18:03PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 02/23/2012 03:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>
>>> And a "clean" 3.2.7 doesn't have that problem?
>>>
>>> Does the same thing happen in Linus's tree at the moment?
>>>
>>
>> Clean 3.2.7 I don't think has that problem, although of course when I
>> run the stress test it fails on other ways so it's hard to 100% rule out.
>>
>> Linus' tree doesn't have that problems.
>
> Ugh.
>
> So, we need more testers, so let me release a -rc kernel with just these
> changes in it, to get a wider testing range, and make an easy "this
> kernel worked, but this one didn't" for people to work with.
>
> I don't suppose that 'git bisect' would work for this, as it's really a
> "all or nothing" type thing with this series from what I can tell,
> right?
>
So far, disabling AES-NI works as expected, so I definitely don't think
it's a driver issue.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 20:54 [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] i387: math_state_restore() isn't called from asm Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] i387: make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 20:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] i387: fix x86-64 preemption-unsafe user stack save/restore Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 20:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] i387: move TS_USEDFPU clearing out of __save_init_fpu and into callers Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 20:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] i387: move TS_USEDFPU flag from thread_info to task_struct Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 21:02 ` [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 21:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-22 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 21:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-22 21:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 20:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 20:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 20:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 20:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 21:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 21:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2012-02-23 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 22:27 ` Willy Tarreau
2012-02-23 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 22:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 22:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2012-02-23 22:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 23:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2012-02-23 22:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2012-02-23 22:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 23:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 23:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 23:19 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-02-23 23:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 23:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-24 0:47 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-02-22 22:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 22:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 23:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 23:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 0:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 0:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 0:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 1:47 ` raphael
2012-02-23 2:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 2:41 ` raphael
2012-02-23 3:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 18:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 19:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 19:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 19:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-02-23 20:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F46DE35.60503@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raphael@buro.asia \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.