From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:40:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:48334 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1903648Ab2BXIkw (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:40:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4F474D02.1040306@openwrt.org> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:40:34 +0100 From: John Crispin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110820 Icedove/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 11/14] NET: MIPS: lantiq: convert etop driver to clkdev api References: <1330012993-13510-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <1330012993-13510-11-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <20120224.032812.10813781440356110.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20120224.032812.10813781440356110.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 32535 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: blogic@openwrt.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: On 24/02/12 09:28, David Miller wrote: > From: John Crispin > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:03:10 +0100 > >> Update from old pmu_{dis,en}able() to ckldev api. >> >> Signed-off-by: John Crispin > Come on guys, don't do crap like this. > > When you have a 14 patch series, and I only see one or two of them > I have no idea what in the world you want me to do with these patches. > > Are they dependent upon the previous patches that weren't sent to me? > > Are they not and I can just apply them as-is? > > Could I apply them as-is, but you want them to go via the MIPS tree > for some reason and just want my ACK? > > Nobody knows because you didn't bother to say one way or another > and that is extremely irritating because as a result I have to > ask you all of these stupid questions and write this rediculious > email. > > I'm just ignoring every single one of these MIPS patches, sorry. Hi, you are right, totally stupid of me to waste other peoples time like this. I forgot the following things * mention that i would welcome a ack'ed by from you * mention that these patches should go via MIPS with the other patches in the series * I should have put in the commit messages, that you were CC'ed on, what the rest of the series does * on the last "fix locking issues" patch I also forgot to CC Ralf and MIPS One question if I may ask * do you want to be CC'ed for a full series even if only 1 patch relates to netdev or should I simply think more about the commit message so it is apparent what i expect ? again, sorry for wasting your time with stupidity ... I will clean up the mess I made during today ... hope you accept my apology, John