From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: fsl: check property 'compatible' for the machine name Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:30:05 -0600 Message-ID: <4F47BB0D.9080905@freescale.com> References: <1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-7-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120224141207.GI5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.186]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB192103910 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:30:29 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20120224141207.GI5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Shawn Guo , Hauer , Sascha@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Mark Brown wrote: > The ARM machines really shouldn't be using the bindings that PowerPC is > using for the machine as they conflate the machine driver with the SSI > binding. The idiom for new systems is that machine drivers should be > first class devices in the device tree referencing the SSI and CODEC. Where is this documented? I don't remember participating in the discussion for this new binding. > The current bindings should be preserved for existing systems of course. There's no reason we can't update the PowerPC device trees. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: timur@freescale.com (Timur Tabi) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:30:05 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: fsl: check property 'compatible' for the machine name In-Reply-To: <20120224141207.GI5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-7-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120224141207.GI5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <4F47BB0D.9080905@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mark Brown wrote: > The ARM machines really shouldn't be using the bindings that PowerPC is > using for the machine as they conflate the machine driver with the SSI > binding. The idiom for new systems is that machine drivers should be > first class devices in the device tree referencing the SSI and CODEC. Where is this documented? I don't remember participating in the discussion for this new binding. > The current bindings should be preserved for existing systems of course. There's no reason we can't update the PowerPC device trees. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale