From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the libata tree Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:01:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4F47C284.6050703@garzik.org> References: <20120213162740.9e3cb47a39da19ed89edea49@canb.auug.org.au> <20120224140814.c134151d30e3f32b36360d5d@canb.auug.org.au> <4F470CB3.2010800@garzik.org> <20120224151410.e245d7610a597504541858ad@canb.auug.org.au> <20120224232212.caf992ef1200adb2b761890c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:44795 "EHLO mail-qw0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757331Ab2BXRB7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:01:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120224232212.caf992ef1200adb2b761890c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett On 02/24/2012 07:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:14:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:06:11 -0500 Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> >>> A build fix and oops fix were both just pushed out. >> >> Excellent, thanks. > > Except the commits in the current version of the libata tree destined for > linux-next do not fix the warnings I was reporting where the "inline" > keyword is missing from several static function definitions in > drivers/ata/libata.h ... Patchset backed out, and hopefully this will get fixed before it appears again in linux-next. Jeff