From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
Subject: Re: regression ioatdma 3.3
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:46:00 +0800
Message-ID: <4F4891B8.9050008@goirand.fr>
References: <CAJ75kXZ-2vWZpG7Uz3firg6ew4y_DdorXotkAkUGSK0GWLMUQQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20120127144737.GA27750@andromeda.dapyr.net>	<20120219223125.GA820@burratino>
	<20120220181618.GD17566@burratino>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120220181618.GD17566@burratino>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, William Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 02/21/2012 02:16 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I just tried with the amd64 kernel and Xen, and I didn't see any issue.
>>
>> However, it is important that Xen 4.1 + Linux 3.2 works with a 32 bits
>> kernel, because that is the most optimized configuration (eg: 64 bits
>> hypervisor, 32 bits kernel and 32 bits userland).
>>     
> Maybe Andres's patches are relevant.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Jonathan
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/660554#25
>   
Hi,

Which patch are you referring to? Is there anything I can do to help
testing/investigating this? Should this be reported in the LKML? How
can I find who's the author of this driver?

Thomas Goirand (zigo)