From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73140E00596 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 14:45:31 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="112404331" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.7.198.148]) ([10.7.198.148]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 14:44:31 -0800 Message-ID: <4F4C074F.9040801@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:44:31 -0800 From: Joshua Lock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Galbusera References: <4F4842AB.1070006@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: adt-installer: cannot install package autoconf-nativesdk X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:45:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 25/02/12 01:41, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Joshua Lock wrote: >> Hi Andrea, >> >> >> On 24/02/12 05:40, Andrea Galbusera wrote: >>> >>> The installer was built against the latest version of its recipe as >>> per commit c6ec5a0d9e31a1694aba25e2ff76f1c933e556d5, >>> adt-installer-0.1.8+svnr596-r6. I guess a change was made with commit >>> de68393270d5455b4861d38cef3f081b9667d25f which requires installing >>> autoconf/automake-nativesdk but relevant ipks are missing from >>> http://adtrepo.yoctoproject.org/1.1/adt-ipk/, which is still default >>> in latest adt_installer.conf. >>> >>> Am I guessing right? First time digging into the adt_installer so I >>> might be completely out of track! Is this a known limit if building >>> adt_installer with latest edison branch? Should I file a bug for this? >>> If so, what's the best solution right now? Maybe using the edison >>> original adt_installer from the yocto downloads... >> >> >> This sounds like you've correctly deduced the issue - it looks like there >> may be required changes which need backporting to the edison repository - >> I'm currently running some builds to verify this. >> >> Please do report this information on bugzilla so that we can track it. It's >> my first time digging into the ADT installer too so it may take a couple of >> days to pull together all of the required fixes. > > Submitted to shiny new bugzilla with #2031. I left the ADT version > unspecified, since I believe we are somewhere between 1.1 and 1.1.1 > with current edison. Thanks - the issue is restricted to Edison so far as I can tell so the bug has been marked thus. > After looking a little closer at the adt_installer.conf generated from > my build tree I noticed the following diffs wrt 1.1. First line looks > pretty strange to me. Hope this helps This is definitely a bug but not preventing you from installing the ADT. I've created a patch for this whilst I'm in this area of code though, thanks. Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre