From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldSBHYWduw6k=?= <mgagne@iweb.com>
Subject: Re: 4.2 TODO List
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:08:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4F4CEDD2.7080403@iweb.com>
References: <1330433434.31269.141.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1330433434.31269.141.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi,

On 2/28/12 7:50 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> tools, blockers:
>
>        * libxl stable API -- we would like 4.2 to define a stable API
>          which downstream's can start to rely on not changing. Aspects of
>          this are:
>                * More formally deprecate xm/xend. Manpage patches already
>                  in tree. Needs release noting and communication around
>                  -rc1 to remind people to test xl.

Will there be support for rate limiting for vif as there is in xm/xend?

The help for the command "network-attach" shows support for "rate". 
Unfortunately, an error occurs when using the "rate" parameter:
"the rate parameter for vifs is currently not supported"

The same applies for the "accel" parameter which I don't know the 
purpose and don't use.

-- 
Mathieu