From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Elder Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] libceph: more miscellaneous cleanups Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:55:37 -0800 Message-ID: <4F4DAFC9.7020309@dreamhost.com> References: <4F4DAF00.5020908@dreamhost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.hq.newdream.net ([66.33.206.127]:59893 "EHLO mail.hq.newdream.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754175Ab2B2Ezi (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:55:38 -0500 Received: from mail.hq.newdream.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hq.newdream.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFBB24314 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.107.136] (aon.hq.newdream.net [64.111.111.107]) by mail.hq.newdream.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1407242C3 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:55:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4DAF00.5020908@dreamhost.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 02/28/2012 08:52 PM, Alex Elder wrote: > Messaging code again. The biggest improvement here is encapsulating > the code that puts data into the write vectors. The second patch just > adds more simple cleanups. What I meant to say was... These are two simple patches, the first is just a simple logic change whose result I thought was slightly more readable. -Alex