* New task issue on linux-libc-headers
@ 2012-02-29 11:00 Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-02-29 11:09 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-03-01 6:29 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Condorelli @ 2012-02-29 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Hi all,
I added an own task into my bbclass source (inherited by my conf file). Let
me to call the new task do_NTASK.
Into the bbclass I added:
addtask NTASK after do_compile before do_install
Then I run the base-image build and I noticed that NTASK is regularly
called but for linux-libc-headers, which do_install task doesn't execute in
this situation. If I remove NTASK from the task list the do_install is run
instead. This is causing a big trouble in my goal but I'm not understanding
why...
Please do you have any suggestion?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New task issue on linux-libc-headers
2012-02-29 11:00 New task issue on linux-libc-headers Giuseppe Condorelli
@ 2012-02-29 11:09 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-02-29 11:38 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-03-01 6:29 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Condorelli @ 2012-02-29 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Moreover if, after the build failure, I perform a bitbake
linux-libc-headers -c clean and then bitbake base-image ... magically
do_NTASK is invoked by linux-libc-headers and also do_install too. What's
happening!?
Il giorno mercoledì 29 febbraio 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I added an own task into my bbclass source (inherited by my conf file).
> Let me to call the new task do_NTASK.
> Into the bbclass I added:
> addtask NTASK after do_compile before do_install
> Then I run the base-image build and I noticed that NTASK is regularly
> called but for linux-libc-headers, which do_install task doesn't execute in
> this situation. If I remove NTASK from the task list the do_install is run
> instead. This is causing a big trouble in my goal but I'm not understanding
> why...
> Please do you have any suggestion?
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New task issue on linux-libc-headers
2012-02-29 11:09 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
@ 2012-02-29 11:38 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Condorelli @ 2012-02-29 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Also running bitbake -b linux-libc-headers_<my_version> the NTASK task is
correctly executed after compile and before install
Il giorno mercoledì 29 febbraio 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli ha scritto:
> Moreover if, after the build failure, I perform a bitbake
> linux-libc-headers -c clean and then bitbake base-image ... magically
> do_NTASK is invoked by linux-libc-headers and also do_install too. What's
> happening!?
>
> Il giorno mercoledì 29 febbraio 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli ha scritto:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I added an own task into my bbclass source (inherited by my conf file).
>> Let me to call the new task do_NTASK.
>> Into the bbclass I added:
>> addtask NTASK after do_compile before do_install
>> Then I run the base-image build and I noticed that NTASK is regularly
>> called but for linux-libc-headers, which do_install task doesn't execute in
>> this situation. If I remove NTASK from the task list the do_install is run
>> instead. This is causing a big trouble in my goal but I'm not understanding
>> why...
>> Please do you have any suggestion?
>> Cheers,
>> Giuseppe
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New task issue on linux-libc-headers
2012-02-29 11:00 New task issue on linux-libc-headers Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-02-29 11:09 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
@ 2012-03-01 6:29 ` Khem Raj
2012-03-01 8:15 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2012-03-01 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 02/29/2012 03:00 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I added an own task into my bbclass source (inherited by my conf file). Let
> me to call the new task do_NTASK.
> Into the bbclass I added:
> addtask NTASK after do_compile before do_install
> Then I run the base-image build and I noticed that NTASK is regularly
> called but for linux-libc-headers, which do_install task doesn't execute in
> this situation. If I remove NTASK from the task list the do_install is run
> instead. This is causing a big trouble in my goal but I'm not understanding
> why...
> Please do you have any suggestion?
do_compile for linux-libc-headers is empty
what does your task do ?
are you using oe-core ?
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New task issue on linux-libc-headers
2012-03-01 6:29 ` Khem Raj
@ 2012-03-01 8:15 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-03-01 8:20 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Condorelli @ 2012-03-01 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Il giorno giovedì 1 marzo 2012, Khem Raj ha scritto:
> On 02/29/2012 03:00 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I added an own task into my bbclass source (inherited by my conf file).
> Let
> > me to call the new task do_NTASK.
> > Into the bbclass I added:
> > addtask NTASK after do_compile before do_install
> > Then I run the base-image build and I noticed that NTASK is regularly
> > called but for linux-libc-headers, which do_install task doesn't execute
> in
> > this situation. If I remove NTASK from the task list the do_install is
> run
> > instead. This is causing a big trouble in my goal but I'm not
> understanding
> > why...
> > Please do you have any suggestion?
>
> do_compile for linux-libc-headers is empty
> what does your task do ?
> are you using oe-core ?
My task is intented to fix all the paths contained in the .pc file the
packages provide. This to meet my goal. I know the do_compile for
linux-libc-headers is empty, but I don't understand why my new task is not
invoked if I run the base-image build and instead it is if I build the
linux-libc-headers (bitbake linux-libc-headers).
I also tried setting nostamp=1 without success.
Any glue?
Thanks for all,
Giuseppe
>
> > Cheers,
> > Giuseppe
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org <javascript:;>
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New task issue on linux-libc-headers
2012-03-01 8:15 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
@ 2012-03-01 8:20 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Condorelli @ 2012-03-01 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Il giorno giovedì 1 marzo 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli ha scritto:
>
>
> Il giorno giovedì 1 marzo 2012, Khem Raj ha scritto:
>
>> On 02/29/2012 03:00 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I added an own task into my bbclass source (inherited by my conf file).
>> Let
>> > me to call the new task do_NTASK.
>> > Into the bbclass I added:
>> > addtask NTASK after do_compile before do_install
>> > Then I run the base-image build and I noticed that NTASK is regularly
>> > called but for linux-libc-headers, which do_install task doesn't
>> execute in
>> > this situation. If I remove NTASK from the task list the do_install is
>> run
>> > instead. This is causing a big trouble in my goal but I'm not
>> understanding
>> > why...
>> > Please do you have any suggestion?
>>
>> do_compile for linux-libc-headers is empty
>> what does your task do ?
>> are you using oe-core ?
>
> My task is intented to fix all the paths contained in the .pc file the
> packages provide. This to meet my goal. I know the do_compile for
> linux-libc-headers is empty, but I don't understand why my new task is not
> invoked if I run the base-image build and instead it is if I build the
> linux-libc-headers (bitbake linux-libc-headers).
> I also tried setting nostamp=1 without success.
>
> I'm using the oe-classic, not yet oe-core. Sorry for having missed the
answer in my latest reply.
> Any glue?
> Thanks for all,
> Giuseppe
>
>>
>> > Cheers,
>> > Giuseppe
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-01 8:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-29 11:00 New task issue on linux-libc-headers Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-02-29 11:09 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-02-29 11:38 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-03-01 6:29 ` Khem Raj
2012-03-01 8:15 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
2012-03-01 8:20 ` Giuseppe Condorelli
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.