From: "Nicolás Echániz" <nicoechaniz@codigosur.org>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] routing loops on interconnected routers / adhoc + ethernet
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:16:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F51D34F.9040204@codigosur.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203031553.53565.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
On 03/03/2012 04:53 AM, Marek Lindner wrote:
> On Saturday, March 03, 2012 15:39:09 Nicolás Echániz wrote:
>> this happens with the nodes configured according to:
>> http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/Bridge-loop-avoidance
>>
>> or so we understand!
>
> If the ethernet is used for mesh purposes uniquely why do you bother running
> the bridge loop avoidance at all instead of adding the ethernet interface as a
> regular batman interface ? The only reason why you would want the bridge loop
> avoidance is when you have ethernet clients that are bridged into the mesh.
> This does not seem to be the case. As far as I understand the ethernet cable
> is used as reliable "wireless cable".
Maerk thanks for your fast reply. In fact, that's how we started, that's
what I meant by:
"We have also tried adding eth0 to bat0 and take it out of br-lan, which
also "works" but gives routing loops from time to time."
but my english sometimes fails me :)
we also had routing loops with that setup and that's where we started to
look at loop avoidance docs.
I haven't saved traceroutes from that moment; I've actually turned off
the wlan0 on the MR now, but I can turn it back on and add eth0 as a
batman interface to reproduce it.
Is this a known issue or should this not happen in a setup where both
interfaces are added to batman?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-03 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-03 7:39 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] routing loops on interconnected routers / adhoc + ethernet Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 7:53 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-03 8:16 ` Nicolás Echániz [this message]
2012-03-03 8:43 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-03 10:14 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 10:24 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 11:32 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-04 2:30 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-04 8:13 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-04 9:32 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-04 10:52 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-18 6:31 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-20 12:51 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F51D34F.9040204@codigosur.org \
--to=nicoechaniz@codigosur.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.