From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S4KlM-0006eo-JT for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:22:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Kl1-0006e3-J3 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:22:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Kkz-0008Vf-U4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:22:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:41978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Kkz-0008VK-Ks for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:22:25 -0500 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so1273468eaa.0 for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.4.141 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.213.4.141; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.4.141 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phcoder@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=phcoder@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.213.4.141]) by 10.213.4.141 with SMTP id 13mr1693248ebr.236.1330903343633 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:22:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fapQGo76PsXAZtNFPory4+F6wdRKbj4zqUrJa3ylZPE=; b=hvirYKq2GDYb6vIFKnel7uTKxDM7OFwFY5taA25TN3GY+tW+xY2Aa0ZPMccu3WL5d/ OujQYNGWJC6Z5CqDCo/4In85Gb/dQjAuCP991CL37Yovj4ETTTOS+rBJYI1OW8s2leri o0RaoQdeTTaGL3wT+idLjAHINFvdHi5l1QMkTzdtuU7SGUSbp9GKGUUf6buhOs41Vbvx h9hHSWFT8q4GFRhs7Rs6MroWQfpKzTWIa0EaYcxjzCImccjwk9pxgxq2r4vLn/aScCVr ThGzDAjlVOYXQCvwkHup/8rUJL84KW1VuJkeThlwTEaWzQG2mungp8KrA0yJkS+yQeih xr8A== Received: by 10.213.4.141 with SMTP id 13mr1276524ebr.236.1330903343546; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (106-191.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch. [62.203.191.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u11sm54270529eeb.1.2012.03.04.15.22.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:22:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F53F92C.2080403@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:22:20 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: GFXMENU: Image scaling References: <1329880062.29448.YahooMailNeo@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1329880062.29448.YahooMailNeo@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:22:47 -0000 > does not scale the image to 20x20. See screenshot: bug-image-scaling-2.png. The image is actually scaled to fit the area between 80% and 100% of the screen's dimension. It's because image exercises pressure in order to be at least as big as source image. We could add a new parameter minimum_width/minimum_height but it would be a feature and I doubt it's worth breaking freeze for this -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko