From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S4LfQ-0000Cn-5V for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:20:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4LfN-0000Ch-8J for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:20:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4LfL-0000tY-Cx for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:20:40 -0500 Received: from wp191.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.198]:41148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4LfL-0000tU-6h for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:20:39 -0500 Received: from p54ba7a6e.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.186.122.110] helo=neptun.omega.ssw.de); authenticated by wp191.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1S4LfJ-00037m-Dn; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:20:37 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neptun.omega.ssw.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939A7E180A8; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:20:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omega.ssw.de Received: from neptun.omega.ssw.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (neptun.omega.ssw.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5WMIGZ3xM8F; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:20:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.43] (p640.fritz.box [192.168.2.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by neptun.omega.ssw.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A201E180A7; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:20:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F5406C4.5030201@anvo-it.de> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:20:20 +0100 From: Andreas Vogel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= Subject: Re: Device instability, gettext and default References: <4F521E88.7070401@gmail.com> <4F53FFE7.2060407@anvo-it.de> <4F5402ED.6010707@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5402ED.6010707@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; andreas.vogel@anvo-it.de; 1330906839; 4fca86aa; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.237.132.198 Cc: The development of GNU GRUB X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:20:42 -0000 Am 05.03.2012 01:03, schrieb Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko: >> options? Any special reason? > 2) Why do you refuse to allow short options for all of the menuentry > Because it shares the space with options to menuentry. Don't understand what you mean. What is shared? >> 3) Wouldn't it be a good chance to use my patch which uses an anonymou= s >> enum for indexing the options array? > No. Thinking like this is a slippery slope. Such patches may also > contain bugs (if you confuse 2 numbers). > Your patch could be committed into experimental but not trunk. > Life doesn't end at 2.00. Nice joke.... that code right now is a slippery slope... with all those obfuscated numbers. Just my 2 cents...