From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S4LtJ-0001fY-Nw for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:35:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4LtH-0001eJ-Gp for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:35:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4LtE-00032t-NF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:35:03 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:40013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4LtE-00032b-Ex for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:35:00 -0500 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so1281858eaa.0 for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.32.200 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.213.32.200; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.213.32.200 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phcoder@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=phcoder@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.213.32.200]) by 10.213.32.200 with SMTP id e8mr2904501ebd.103.1330907698479 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:34:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SVbQdHPB2BsFBstmC37Q7pLeMUFEibJxkaz7CBs/IJQ=; b=L2SYl3yOou5qKlY/CrPxrdBLH5352kOU1S8mN9T6Me5EPcPyWoVxwohfGOisgfxcwI A03bbnpRXfWTNmdMKjWJnFmAQPLRpDyg0OJhusyk+3m6PMVGs3NK01fnua8RfOVa4W+o 9pzpc0ETd+LW1+juQ7gDVYGeNL35fyfzLdaugP9404YNS9r7IN1ZkzhPbAAUjb01DGEJ rgJTQTS4jyPB6e25XcO++24M5BG4UNpPID6EAZ4DDe6ceBMfffEU6o2/Aom8q4Y5Opby DMHc47gzAOP4g5rI7l6PsYY/lZNT8PdlVcTFH0tWVEi0vgSkQBibszSFuaNmDLLGjxnR Zfqg== Received: by 10.213.32.200 with SMTP id e8mr2196040ebd.103.1330907698369; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (106-191.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch. [62.203.191.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u11sm54915487eeb.1.2012.03.04.16.34.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:34:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F540A2F.1070008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:34:55 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Vogel Subject: Re: Device instability, gettext and default References: <4F521E88.7070401@gmail.com> <4F53FFE7.2060407@anvo-it.de> <4F5402ED.6010707@gmail.com> <4F5406C4.5030201@anvo-it.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5406C4.5030201@anvo-it.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 Cc: The development of GNU GRUB X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:35:04 -0000 On 05.03.2012 01:20, Andreas Vogel wrote: > Am 05.03.2012 01:03, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko: >>> options? Any special reason? >> 2) Why do you refuse to allow short options for all of the menuentry >> Because it shares the space with options to menuentry. > Don't understand what you mean. What is shared? menuentry "title" hello { echo $1; sleep 10 } >>> 3) Wouldn't it be a good chance to use my patch which uses an anonymous >>> enum for indexing the options array? >> No. Thinking like this is a slippery slope. Such patches may also >> contain bugs (if you confuse 2 numbers). >> Your patch could be committed into experimental but not trunk. >> Life doesn't end at 2.00. > Nice joke.... that code right now is a slippery slope... with all those > obfuscated numbers. Just my 2 cents... > It may be unreadable and more difficult to maintain but neither matters much for the release. Readability cleanup can be done after release without problems. If we start clean this and other files now, we'll spend too much time and be generally counterproductive. I understand that it may feel as if I'm having anything against you but I don't, just releasing 2.00 is now a top priority and because of this fixing bugs is important. Everything that is not to fix bugs or was already announced at freeze as still accepted (all of which is now in) is secondary now. > -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko