From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S4MvI-0000qF-DQ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:41:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4MvC-0000pU-U4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:41:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Mv8-0004vY-I5 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:41:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:39807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Mv8-0004vS-8k for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:41:02 -0500 Received: by eeke53 with SMTP id e53so1341152eek.0 for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.14.119.136 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.119.136; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.14.119.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phcoder@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=phcoder@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.119.136]) by 10.14.119.136 with SMTP id n8mr10040057eeh.87.1330911660331 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:41:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dnZcTLg8HhioSyzi9NMlBkEPIDJAw+BMEwMBiVzZHpg=; b=fwH2xG9h72bfiYbYgdzJ93etzQbdwuHC0yteMZ0b0+ZHoUY4X4zxwnEnpRsWdOoObg UDvZsFt3PAPjV+iHzotYigmAQKapqpLZceRD0IYLVC9c4s/jhaXRNEO6JCruisobg7Cu 0c9AqaLLUGrh93fBX9NET1dqsUBSKjH3670Mv5LsQY2fSiDLUTAgoFykGspaydV+uFuf ap0wwJA29Alf2T9fgyJNFpQZXdVrYAO5Llib9L6pjvFVGD9dMLX+UFDChInNNc2lQ0C6 Apnu2rhD8IWej8IDSY81AZGFaVT3b4Ysc98+lmN+NkWU6c08Cle4+Oy3xr3zdty50JpR 6Q9w== Received: by 10.14.119.136 with SMTP id n8mr7642465eeh.87.1330911660252; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (106-191.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch. [62.203.191.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o11sm47080690eef.4.2012.03.04.17.40.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:40:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F5419A9.1080300@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 02:40:57 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: Ideas for the future References: <4F541349.7070704@anvo-it.de> <4F541723.6030105@gmail.com> <20120305013504.GW4285@type.famille.thibault.fr> In-Reply-To: <20120305013504.GW4285@type.famille.thibault.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.83.41 Cc: Samuel Thibault , Andreas Vogel X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:41:11 -0000 On 05.03.2012 02:35, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Mon 05 Mar 2012 02:30:11 +0100, a écrit : >>> 6) menuentry --enabled 0|1 >>> It's a good practice to show menuentries even if they are not applicable >>> in different situations (that's common for all major menu systems). If a >>> menu entry is disabled, it is shown but it is not operable. E.g. one >>> might have a general grub config file which supports booting a bunch of >>> ISO images. When an ISO image is not found and instead of not showing a >>> menuentry for that, those menuentry could be shown as disabled. >> This seems like just cluttering the view. Remember that in some applications >> (e.g. braille) menu has to be very concise. We support even the tiny (40x1) >> terminal geometries. > Actually, 40x1 is relatively large for a braille device. A lot of them > are 20x1. 20x1 works as well. The bare minimum is 5x1 (we need 4 positions to indicate that there are more entries or more chars in the entry). For less than 20x1 4 special positions become wasteful and the code should probably check those explicitly. Is less than 20x1 common? > Samuel > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko