From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S4WSP-0000yc-7m for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:52:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38985) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4WS0-0000HZ-37 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:51:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4WRt-0004Gx-GD for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:51:35 -0500 Received: from wp191.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.198]:45806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4WRt-0004Gm-9O for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:51:29 -0500 Received: from p4ff1551c.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.241.85.28] helo=neptun.omega.ssw.de); authenticated by wp191.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1S4WRr-0000tL-31; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:51:27 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neptun.omega.ssw.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E38E180A8; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:51:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omega.ssw.de Received: from neptun.omega.ssw.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (neptun.omega.ssw.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id abAwGS5zTjXl; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:51:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.43] (p640.fritz.box [192.168.2.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by neptun.omega.ssw.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E791BE180A7; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:51:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F54A8B6.2010604@anvo-it.de> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:51:18 +0100 From: Andreas Vogel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= Subject: Re: Device instability, gettext and default References: <4F521E88.7070401@gmail.com> <4F53FFE7.2060407@anvo-it.de> <4F5402ED.6010707@gmail.com> <4F5406C4.5030201@anvo-it.de> <4F540A2F.1070008@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F540A2F.1070008@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; andreas.vogel@anvo-it.de; 1330948289; 2b5f9653; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.237.132.198 Cc: The development of GNU GRUB X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:52:00 -0000 Am 05.03.2012 01:34, schrieb Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko: > On 05.03.2012 01:20, Andreas Vogel wrote: >> Am 05.03.2012 01:03, schrieb Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenk= o: >>>> options? Any special reason? >>> 2) Why do you refuse to allow short options for all of the menuentry >>> Because it shares the space with options to menuentry. >> Don't understand what you mean. What is shared? > menuentry "title" hello { > echo $1; sleep 10 > }=20 I'm really sorry, but i still don't understand.... and I'd really like to understand it. Why is it OK for the menuentry command to accept long options but not OK to accept short options? What is the difference here handling long options opposed to handling short options?