From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S4XBH-0000WH-QK for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 07:38:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56897) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4XB6-0000V3-W7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 07:38:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4XAx-0006Vs-9O for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 07:38:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:60143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4XAx-0006VI-0O for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 07:38:03 -0500 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so1433587eaa.0 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.14.204.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.204.3; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of phcoder@gmail.com designates 10.14.204.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phcoder@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=phcoder@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.204.3]) by 10.14.204.3 with SMTP id g3mr1292864eeo.75.1330951080103 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:38:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VED0fiMavHmh0AvEaAa1YFKNOQwC3b6EAa1q36geRAA=; b=owwUWE47UCxuD4jLKBLifjzLVDqpSjipFthVE68ZOohlMGya1lXZDRp1O6GiJFsAgG CGLx2qaydckkCgnWA0Op16eG4qe3JGlqe5lwoNAAKHlEx4yzvUqXew0Sb0ZsFA7va2H6 Q2B9MX/VrMY1WlgZ8HR4/ddu8nhbtQu3QSC5KWrKYYpwu6wLEBc9Gao/LhWAY+5MtcUY m5rZlQesldTN874nrjNxRugEwVHZyXsq6SSNpWnKfsddq8mMI7/YFAb0d9Mc1NrjH7ko LDFyxFmz4poFIkHptzk+hRhqhxiQknv2VvvrqDL3BffrdaDdoD0DA0y3cgcEmQjAAsB0 8kaA== Received: by 10.14.204.3 with SMTP id g3mr959214eeo.75.1330951080044; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (15-234.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.197.234.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u11sm61305702eeb.1.2012.03.05.04.37.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:37:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F54B3A0.5020607@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:37:52 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: Device instability, gettext and default References: <4F521E88.7070401@gmail.com> <4F53FFE7.2060407@anvo-it.de> <4F5402ED.6010707@gmail.com> <4F5406C4.5030201@anvo-it.de> <4F540A2F.1070008@gmail.com> <4F54A8B6.2010604@anvo-it.de> In-Reply-To: <4F54A8B6.2010604@anvo-it.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:38:22 -0000 On 05.03.2012 12:51, Andreas Vogel wrote: > Am 05.03.2012 01:34, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko: >> On 05.03.2012 01:20, Andreas Vogel wrote: >>> Am 05.03.2012 01:03, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko: >>>>> options? Any special reason? >>>> 2) Why do you refuse to allow short options for all of the menuentry >>>> Because it shares the space with options to menuentry. >>> Don't understand what you mean. What is shared? >> menuentry "title" hello { >> echo $1; sleep 10 >> } > I'm really sorry, but i still don't understand.... and I'd really like > to understand it. > > Why is it OK for the menuentry command to accept long options but not OK > to accept short options? What is the difference here handling long > options opposed to handling short options? The menuentry itself might want to define options on its own. Space of long options is large enough to easily avoid conflicts but the space of short ones isn't. > > > > -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko