From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bmoQ8gAF4C0M5X1r26FgmkPrtr5UPczh60Autjx72hk=; b=t16IlOqgSdQMD007TKEY/ZOXNHLhNVXNQ5igYi9/FIlwHd/pH5ascjX3Brbi7ybRNb j+N1UGBnagZXo8eV3eT4BN8GFzIQjoaYgxU5oDrZ+6Udg/tPraHc4BHPT3PAruql5qK2 J9hX+4/MXKW3Mk4+dirmvUAJa1p0TvosvaiU7XDRli6OtSki8HUJz/GvUopSoC9rlJHu 95MWb4C52gUlU06HQVx8clXAZ7fuDfOrB0j2ABTjOc1A1uxtuw+mvv4OVn64u1tpfwNx VRyGwdUvGvK9u3MGfY8r/EVLEyWqnEEccUbU3HqsgEiSC5HKbH4o5nOahMO+Yqe+ekHG DtRg== Message-ID: <4F54D580.7090608@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:02:24 +0100 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1330687322.32498.3.camel@rubik> <20120302.210815.55716582.sho@bbr.jp> <1330690418.32498.29.camel@rubik> <20120303.113354.329374074.sho@bbr.jp> <1330949656.9812.8.camel@rubik> In-Reply-To: <1330949656.9812.8.camel@rubik> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] pdftopdf List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Koji Otani Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org Otani-san, for the time being until we succeed to get the Poppler developers to expose the additional APIs for implementing pdftopdf and pdftoopvp, can you update the duplictaed code to the newest file versions available, so that the known vulnerabilities are fixed? Thanks in advance. Till On 03/05/2012 01:14 PM, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 11:33 +0900, Koji Otani wrote: >> Sorry, I'm not good at English. > > Your English is fine. :-) > >> It seemes that poppler provides parsing and rendering PDF. >> pdftopdf needs modifying PDF such as number-up, duplicating pages , >> inserting empty pages, scaling pages, embedding fonts and producing PDF. >> When I began to develop poppler, I considered about various things >> such as limited time, cost, etc. And I decided that I developed pdftopdf >> outside of poppler. (Developing pdftopdf was funded by a Japanese governmental >> organization) >> It may be ok for poppler to include these features as you say. >> I would appreciate it if you put these features into poppler. > > Thanks for explaining. If poppler doesn't currently expose enough to > allow pdftopdf to do what it needs to then some work is needed to change > that, in order to avoid duplication of bugs. > > Who knows the pdftopdf/poppler code well enough to do this? > > Do we know anyone on the poppler development team who could guide us as > to what sort of changes they will accept? > > Tim. > */ >