From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3675FE0074A for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 077ACF81218; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:43:24 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE4EF811F5; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:43:13 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4F54ED21.9000208@mlbassoc.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:43:13 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org References: <3BC330F9-CE58-4C4F-A473-B0F40D0A2777@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F4BA9EE.8030908@balister.org> <3A03FCB1-56B0-42C4-9260-24B10EF4531E@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F4BB801.3090108@ti.com> <329D2F11-A3FF-4029-8F3D-EC6A7587D138@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Building Yocto for Pandaboard X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:43:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-03-05 09:39, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Christian.Schulenberg@bmw.de wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm using a Pandaboard Rev A4, so it is in fact an OMAP4430 board. >> >> You can change to u-boot bootloader in /meta-ti/conf/machine/omap4430-panda.conf: > > i noticed that koen just submitted a sizable patch that gets rid of > that conf file for the panda, and standardizes on the pandaboard.conf > file (at least that's what it looked like). > > under the circumstances, it might be worth just waiting until that > patch works its way through the system and start testing all over > again when it hits. Yes, you'll also get a newer kernel (3.0.2 last I looked, not 2.6.35) -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------