From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4rmn-0004Uc-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:38:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4rmi-0000Vn-Dd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:38:28 -0500 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:33179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4rmi-0000Uo-6C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:38:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4F55E914.3020607@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:38:12 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120213132417.GG32182@redhat.com> <4F51FD52.6080407@suse.de> <4F52066B.4040206@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20120306100705.GB7588@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120306100705.GB7588@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU desired libiscsi.so clashes with libiscsi.so from iscsi-initiator-utils List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hannes Reinecke , ronnie sahlberg , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= On 06.03.2012 14:07, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 03:54:19PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> It looks like iscsi-initiator-utils package in fedora is built using >> shared libiscsi which appears to be package-specific, e.g. > > Yes, it is the iscsi-initiator-utils package > >> I'd rename _that_ library to be libiscsi-initiator-utils.so, to >> reflect the name of the package in question, since it - again - >> _appears_ to be package-specific. > > That's not really practical at this time, since it has been shipped this > way for years now, Why it is not practical for something which is not used for anything but just the internal library? I'd say it was a mistake to name this internal library this way to start with, and now it is as good time to do so as any other time, because, again, it is just some internal-to-the-package thing. > and in any case ronnie has already been good enough > to rename to libiscsiclient to avoid the potential ambiguity. Now the resulting libiscsiclient has alot of _real_ ambiguity, unfortunately. /mjt