From: Amit Virdi <amit.virdi@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB:host: Attribute packed removed from usb structures
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:36:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F55FDBE.2000904@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4DFD0C.4010707@st.com>
Hello Mike and Marek,
On 2/29/2012 3:55 PM, Amit Virdi wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> On 2/28/2012 6:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>>>>>> Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a ?crit :
>>>>>>>> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
>>>>>>>> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
>>>>>>>> Reverting the structures to non-packed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If (just asking, not asserting) the issue is caused by fields being
>>>>>>> u8 where u8 access is not possible, then should you not make the
>>>>>>> fields u16 / u32 according to access requirements?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is not with the fields being of a different width. AFAIK,
>>>>>> the packed attribute changes the generated code to access even the
>>>>>> word field elements in a byte by byte manner
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Infact, there is a discussion on lkml that I can point
>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/27/278
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems that the discussion did not lead to a conclusion but it was
>>>>>> sensible (at least for ARM) to remove the packed attribute from this
>>>>>> structure
>>>>>
>>>>> What does the USB spec say ? It might be a HW bug?
>>>>
>>>> it isn't covered by the USB spec. these are structs for hardware
>>>> registers in the EHCI usb host controller.
>>>
>>> I see ... so replacing them with unions of accessors where it colides
>>> might
>>> work ?
>>
>> i'm not entirely sure what you're asking, but i think you're pointing
>> to the
>> right answer: drivers/usb/host/ehci.h:ehci_{read,write}l() should
>> *not* be
>> casting/derferencing the pointers directly. they should instead be using
>> standard {read,write}l() funcs from asm/io.h.
>>
>> Amit: can you post a new patch that does that instead ? don't touch the
>> packed attribute, but change ehci_readl() to use readl() and
>> ehci_writel() to
>> use writel() ?
>
> I'll make the changes and post the patch after testing successfully.
>
I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
come here too.
Today, I used armv7-linux-gcc (GCC) v4.6.2
So I suspect there has been some fix done in the GCC.
Now, even with the packed attributes, the word fields are accessed
word-by-word in contrast to the earlier observed behavior
(byte-by-byte). I could see ldr and str in the disassembly.
May be, we can discard this patch and keep drivers/usb/host/ehci.h intact.
Thanks
Amit Virdi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 11:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB:host: Attribute packed removed from usb structures Amit Virdi
2012-02-24 19:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-27 10:02 ` Amit Virdi
2012-02-27 18:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-25 10:12 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-02-27 7:16 ` Vipin Kumar
2012-02-27 13:14 ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-27 18:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-27 20:53 ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-28 0:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-29 10:25 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-06 12:06 ` Amit Virdi [this message]
2012-03-06 12:51 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-07 8:30 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-07 11:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-07 12:12 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-06 16:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-03-07 8:23 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-07 13:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-03-07 13:49 ` Amit Virdi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F55FDBE.2000904@st.com \
--to=amit.virdi@st.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.