From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C21E0132F for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 05:35:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 5B80FF81274; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 06:35:42 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50628F81208; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 06:35:41 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4F5612AD.5040005@mlbassoc.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:35:41 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Enrico References: <4F560422.8050405@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: meta-ti vs meta-texasinstruments X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:35:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-03-06 06:19, Enrico wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> Why are there two layers, each seemingly providing support for >> TI products (boards, tools, etc)? They have a great overlap, >> but many differences... >> >> Shouldn't there only be one such layer? As is, the meta-texasinstruments >> one seems to be rather out of date, but I'm not sure. > > url of these layers? Maybe it's just an old reference in your setup > that is not getting updated (previously it was called > meta-texasinstruments and then it became meta-ti). Indeed, the meta-texasinstruments one may just be left over chaff. That said, where is u-boot-fw-utils (assuming not meta-texasinstruments)? A quick find in angstrom/sources shows ./meta-ti/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2011.12.bb:RRECOMMENDS_${PN}_beagleboard = "u-boot-fw-utils" ./meta-ti/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:RRECOMMENDS_${PN}_omap3-touchbook = "u-boot-fw-utils" ./meta-texasinstruments/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:PACKAGES += "${PN}-fw-utils" ./meta-texasinstruments/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:FILES_${PN}-fw-utils = "${sysconfdir} ${base_sbindir}" ./meta-openpandora/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:PACKAGES += "${PN}-fw-utils" ./meta-openpandora/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:FILES_${PN}-fw-utils = "${sysconfdir} ${base_sbindir}" ./meta-openpandora/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-fw-utils = True ./meta-efikamx/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:PACKAGES += "${PN}-fw-utils" ./meta-efikamx/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:FILES_${PN}-fw-utils = "${sysconfdir} ${base_sbindir}" ./meta-efikamx/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-fw-utils = "1" -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------