From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5BBE0132F for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 05:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 27803F81276; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 06:54:28 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F613F81208; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 06:54:24 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4F561710.7090903@mlbassoc.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:54:24 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koen Kooi References: <4F560422.8050405@mlbassoc.com> <4F5612AD.5040005@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: meta-ti vs meta-texasinstruments X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:54:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-03-06 06:39, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 6 mrt. 2012, om 14:35 heeft Gary Thomas het volgende geschreven: > >> On 2012-03-06 06:19, Enrico wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> Why are there two layers, each seemingly providing support for >>>> TI products (boards, tools, etc)? They have a great overlap, >>>> but many differences... >>>> >>>> Shouldn't there only be one such layer? As is, the meta-texasinstruments >>>> one seems to be rather out of date, but I'm not sure. >>> >>> url of these layers? Maybe it's just an old reference in your setup >>> that is not getting updated (previously it was called >>> meta-texasinstruments and then it became meta-ti). >> >> Indeed, the meta-texasinstruments one may just be left over chaff. >> >> That said, where is u-boot-fw-utils (assuming not meta-texasinstruments)? > > Hmm, let's look at the README and the layers it lists as requirements and take the first one, oe-core: > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=4a2543c0641f1df6d74c18cfe0c3ac3cfd50e60c Which was missed by my simple search of "fw-utils" _inside_ the recipes, not the recipe names themselves. Thanks -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------