From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1E4E0132F for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 06:08:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlep26.itg.ti.com ([157.170.170.121]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q26E8JAN016157; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:08:19 -0600 Received: from DLEE74.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dlep26.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q26E8JNa014813; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:08:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DLEE74.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:08:19 -0600 Received: from gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com (gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.100.52]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q26E8ILw029435; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:08:18 -0600 Message-ID: <4F561A52.5090209@ti.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:08:18 -0500 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Dmytriyenko References: <20120306005241.GF2030@denix.org> In-Reply-To: <20120306005241.GF2030@denix.org> Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Fw: OpenEmbbedded as a test suite next steps X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:08:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/05/2012 07:52 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > All, > > Early planning stages of what's going to be a meta-linaro toolchain layer for > OE-Core/Yocto. Interesting stuff, we should probably pitch in for some of the > items there, that we can help with - such as selection of the platforms with > recent kernels and possibly cloud builds... Any thoughts? > Yes, absolutely, I do indeed concur wholeheartedly! I was about to suggest that for kernel they just target the qemu arm machine. Does oe-core treat that as armv7?