From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f48.google.com (mail-yw0-f48.google.com [209.85.213.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C3CE004D2 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 07:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by yhfq46 with SMTP id q46so2822752yhf.35 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of raj.khem@gmail.com designates 10.60.4.227 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.4.227; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of raj.khem@gmail.com designates 10.60.4.227 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=raj.khem@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=raj.khem@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.4.227]) by 10.60.4.227 with SMTP id n3mr9533573oen.67.1331046987184 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:16:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ONh1ONBg5acWskDwK51Wu2pHMXevJxEG+MIFcRrjkgg=; b=omeqQl2Rau7M5RVUNzZ0jIpoLG0JV8hKNmnRwsEUDFUY1tAZH1fcCozeF0nvkqIcUs K32mmfwE87GrLoOuw7rCY+ijkQHQ7fwSpb56T0AEW6jO8H0qSpEeWqr4LjB/eguwW2qS gvAdiMEONSziM9ZFwtXT9tQ5BBqtshvJsHOOnc360hD/Xd2a45oIlUYzbbx/9rvr0piS dRNQoEICScdv3Zzy1gPtFWYJNK64PRzCFZCT9aMbqdIUHBiOvjncQwYAG0pmyGFSHi2P leZkdeUQTUxA97Qf9enQoqUIspsC9vzLcuCbLdJ4bA88wgZMIse7ZDjzVmDM9lUcmx35 +W2Q== Received: by 10.60.4.227 with SMTP id n3mr8415122oen.67.1331046985986; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.78] (99-57-140-209.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.57.140.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y18sm17658257obq.21.2012.03.06.07.16.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:16:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F562A34.2020304@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:16:04 -0800 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120302 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <1331010578.2107.2.camel@elnicho> <4F55A7D7.8020100@windriver.com> <1331016505.2107.37.camel@elnicho> <4F55D32F.6050705@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4F55D32F.6050705@windriver.com> Subject: Re: iptables not building on master X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:16:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/06/2012 01:04 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers > a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-matches > the kernel in the sysroot, we can add this: > > #define __aligned_u64 __u64 __attribute__((aligned(8))) > > to: > > iptables-1.4.12.2/include/linux/types.h > > to fix this problem. find out why iptables has its own copy of linux/types.h that file should be deleted if there is no reason to have it. > > Another solution is that as Dexuan suggested we change the order of > the include header files, but I'm afraid that may cause other problems, > since I think that the pkg's own header file should have a higher priority > than the system's, so I think that the current order is correct. > > I will send a pull request after enough testing. > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto