From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for assigned PCI 2.3 devices
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F563042.1020703@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F562E69.4040907@redhat.com>
On 2012-03-06 16:34, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 03:19 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> PCI 2.3 allows to generically disable IRQ sources at device level. This
>> enables us to share legacy IRQs of such devices with other host devices
>> when passing them to a guest.
>>
>> The new IRQ sharing feature introduced here is optional, user space has
>> to request it explicitly. Moreover, user space can inform us about its
>> view of PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE so that we can avoid unmasking the
>> interrupt and signaling it if the guest masked it via the virtualized
>> PCI config space.
>
> Long delay, sorry.
>
> I'm sure we discussed this before, so a URL would be sufficient: why
> cannot this be transparent to userspace?
Yes, we did, and you may recall I tried hard to implement it. The
reasons for not following this path were given in one of the previous
postings:
"To recall the history of it: I tried hard to implement an adaptive
solution that automatically picks the fastest masking technique whenever
possible. However, the changes required to the IRQ core subsystem and
the logic of the device assignment code became so complex and partly
ugly that I gave up on this. It's simply not worth the pain given that
legacy PCI interrupts are rarely raised for performance critical device
at such a high rate (KHz...) that you can measure the difference."
>
> As for the actual patch, I am so unfamiliar with the device assignment
> code now that I'll have to rely on Alex's review.
>
Then let's hope he didn't miss any of my bugs.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 13:19 [PATCH v4] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for assigned PCI 2.3 devices Jan Kiszka
2012-02-29 15:22 ` Alex Williamson
2012-02-29 15:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-02-29 16:27 ` Alex Williamson
2012-03-06 15:34 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-06 15:41 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-03-06 15:53 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-06 16:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-07 10:23 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F563042.1020703@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.