All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Hundebøll" <m.hundeboll@gmail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.3] rt2x00: fix random stalls
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:37:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F568389.8080803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F564CDC.5040808@gmail.com>

Hi,

I'm very sorry about the size of my previous mail. I hope that it was not too trouble.

/ Martin

On 03/06/2012 06:43 PM, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/05/2012 05:48 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>> Is possible that we stop queue and then do not wake up it again,
>> especially when packets are transmitted fast. That can be easily
>> reproduced with modified tx queue entry_num to some small value e.g. 16.
>>
>> If mac80211 already hold local->queue_stop_reason_lock, then we can wait
>> on that lock in both rt2x00queue_pause_queue() and
>> rt2x00queue_unpause_queue(). After drooping ->queue_stop_reason_lock
>> is possible that __ieee80211_wake_queue() will be performed before
>> __ieee80211_stop_queue(), hence we stop queue and newer wake up it
>> again.
>>
>> To prevent stalls serialize pause/unpause by queue->tx_lock.
>
> I've been having CPU load issues with rt2800usb/Ralink RT2870, when doing simultaneous TX/RX between to nodes in an adhoc network. While transfering UDP packets in one direction with iperf[1], I get ~23Mbit/s and kworker is utilizing <10% of the CPU (OMAP4 1GHz dualcore or/and Pentium M 1.70GHz) on both ends. When doing bidirectional tests with iperf[2], one kworker thread jumps too 100% and throughput drops.
>
> By using two iperf clients to do bidirectional TCP transfers, I got ~6Mbit/s in both directions, so I suspected some queueing issues and thus applied this patch, but no change. I've tried to do some tracing[3], but this is quite new to me, so please instruct me, if you need more info.
>
> Kind regards,
> Martin Hundebøll
>
> [1]
>  iperf unidirectional cmd and output:
> # iperf -c10.10.10.56 -ub50M
> Server Report:
> 0.0-10.0 sec  27.5 MBytes  22.9 Mbits/sec   1.639 ms    0/19602 (0%)
>
> [2]
>  iperf bidirectional cmd and output:
> # iperf -c10.10.10.56 -udb8M
> Sent 2501 datagrams
> [  3]  0.0-11.0 sec  1.26 MBytes   963 Kbits/sec  22.437 ms  943/ 1840 (51%)
> Server Report:
> [  4]  0.0-10.9 sec  2.11 MBytes  1.62 Mbits/sec  309.803 ms  993/ 2500 (40%)
>
> [3]
> out.txt has a trace from 10.10.10.55 while running iperf as in [2] and the following commands:
> $ echo workqueue:workqueue_queue_work > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > out.txt


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-06 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-05 16:48 [PATCH 3.3] rt2x00: fix random stalls Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 19:27 ` [rt2x00-users] " Ivo Van Doorn
2012-03-05 19:54 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2012-03-06  6:53   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-06  7:45 ` Helmut Schaa
2012-03-06 11:53   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-06 12:08     ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2012-03-07 18:25       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
     [not found] ` <4F564CDC.5040808@gmail.com>
2012-03-06 21:37   ` Martin Hundebøll [this message]
2012-03-07 18:46   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-11  9:53     ` Martin Hundebøll

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F568389.8080803@gmail.com \
    --to=m.hundeboll@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.