From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com (Cong Wang) Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:09:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA In-Reply-To: References: <1331090098-25097-1-git-send-email-Barry.Song@csr.com> <4F56E0AC.8070501@gmail.com> <4F56EA49.8070808@gmail.com> <4F56EBA6.6000704@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4F56ED9D.3000504@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/07/2012 01:05 PM, Barry Song wrote: > 2012/3/7 Cong Wang: >> On 03/07/2012 12:57 PM, Barry Song wrote: >>> >>> >>> if you think so, pls do that and send v4 with your s-o-b. >>> >> >> This is not a good attitude, nor helps your patch to be merged... >> >> Be collaborative. > > some people like focusing on trivial things. i said i really didn't > care about the details whether it is /dev, /proc, /sys. > if you like a /proc, pls do it by yourself and i will agree. but i > will not waste my time on that. This is definitely not trivial... What's more, kernel developers *do* care about trivial things (trivial at kernel.org). We are trying to make your patch perfect, you just refused, sigh... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751872Ab2CGFKA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 00:10:00 -0500 Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:46965 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805Ab2CGFJ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 00:09:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4F56ED9D.3000504@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:09:49 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> CC: Barry Song , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, workgroup.linux@csr.com, mina86@mina86.com, Barry Song , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA References: <1331090098-25097-1-git-send-email-Barry.Song@csr.com> <4F56E0AC.8070501@gmail.com> <4F56EA49.8070808@gmail.com> <4F56EBA6.6000704@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/07/2012 01:05 PM, Barry Song wrote: > 2012/3/7 Cong Wang: >> On 03/07/2012 12:57 PM, Barry Song wrote: >>> >>> >>> if you think so, pls do that and send v4 with your s-o-b. >>> >> >> This is not a good attitude, nor helps your patch to be merged... >> >> Be collaborative. > > some people like focusing on trivial things. i said i really didn't > care about the details whether it is /dev, /proc, /sys. > if you like a /proc, pls do it by yourself and i will agree. but i > will not waste my time on that. This is definitely not trivial... What's more, kernel developers *do* care about trivial things (trivial@kernel.org). We are trying to make your patch perfect, you just refused, sigh...