Re: [PATCH v2] ath6kl: Add provision to define suspend policy in disconnected state.

[Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>]

On 03/07/2012 07:20 AM, Raja Mani wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 09:42 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>>> +		if (ret&&  (!ar->wow_suspend_mode ||
>>> +		    ar->wow_suspend_mode == WLAN_POWER_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP))
>>> +				try_deepsleep = true;
>>
>> I don't get this part. If the wow_mode parameter is set to 0 or 2 the
>> functionality is the same, right? So what's the point with 0x2 the
>> commit log? Deep sleep will be the default in disconnected anyway.
>> Unless I misunderstood something, of course.
> 
> Yes, the functionality is the same for both cases (0 or 2).
> passing 2 to wow_mode is an explicitly option.
> The value 0 is the default case.
> 
> Should we remove option 2 in wow_mode and keep only
> option 1 ?

Thanks, now I understand. No need to change anything, I'll just clarify
in the commit log that option 2 is the default as well.

Kalle