From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: backport requests for 4.x-testing Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:08:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4F5741BE.7090101@citrix.com> References: <4F573C28.1050305@citrix.com> <4F574F3D0200007800076E2F@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F574F3D0200007800076E2F@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/03/12 11:06, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 07.03.12 at 11:59, Keir Fraser wrote: >> On 07/03/2012 10:44, "Andrew Cooper" wrote: >>> So they are not. It appears that there was an off-by-6 numbering error >>> in our patch queue for these patches. Apologies for that. >>> >>> The numbers were in fact 24536,24537,24564,24565. >> Applied. > Hmm, if you apply 24537, then you should also pull in 24971 (perhaps > once it made it through the stage tests). > > Jan Yes - I had my eye on that patch. I will pull it through after it passes the tests. -- Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com