From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix compilation error. Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 05:06:09 -0800 Message-ID: <4F575D41.8030301@samsung.com> References: <1331100559-28849-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:57548 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755314Ab2CGNGN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:06:13 -0500 Received: by obbuo6 with SMTP id uo6so6889009obb.19 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 05:06:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1331100559-28849-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Sachin Kamat Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, patches@linaro.org On 03/06/12 22:09, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Commit 734b5bb7375 ("Merge branch 'next/soc-exynos5250-arch-wip' into= for-next") > on for-next branch of Kukjin's tree gives the following build errors: > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c:1328:2: error: =E2=80=98clk_sclk= _mmc0=E2=80=99 > undeclared here (not in a function) > arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c:1329:2: error: =E2=80=98clk_sclk= _mmc1=E2=80=99 > undeclared here (not in a function) > arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c:1330:2: error: =E2=80=98clk_sclk= _mmc2=E2=80=99 > undeclared here (not in a function) > arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c:1331:2: error: =E2=80=98clk_sclk= _mmc3=E2=80=99 > undeclared here (not in a function) > > This commit fixes the same. > > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c b/arch/arm/mach-exy= nos/clock-exynos4.c > index d72a1fe..bcb59e7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c > @@ -1325,10 +1325,10 @@ static struct clk_lookup exynos4_clk_lookup[]= =3D { > CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4210-uart.1", "clk_uart_baud0",&exynos4_clk_scl= k_uart1.clk), > CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4210-uart.2", "clk_uart_baud0",&exynos4_clk_scl= k_uart2.clk), > CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4210-uart.3", "clk_uart_baud0",&exynos4_clk_scl= k_uart3.clk), > - CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.0", "mmc_busclk.2",&clk_sclk_mmc0.clk), > - CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.1", "mmc_busclk.2",&clk_sclk_mmc1.clk), > - CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.2", "mmc_busclk.2",&clk_sclk_mmc2.clk), > - CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.3", "mmc_busclk.2",&clk_sclk_mmc3.clk), > + CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.0", "mmc_busclk.2",&exynos4_clk_sclk_mmc= 0.clk), > + CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.1", "mmc_busclk.2",&exynos4_clk_sclk_mmc= 1.clk), > + CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.2", "mmc_busclk.2",&exynos4_clk_sclk_mmc= 2.clk), > + CLKDEV_INIT("exynos4-sdhci.3", "mmc_busclk.2",&exynos4_clk_sclk_mmc= 3.clk), > CLKDEV_INIT("dma-pl330.0", "apb_pclk",&exynos4_clk_pdma0), > CLKDEV_INIT("dma-pl330.1", "apb_pclk",&exynos4_clk_pdma1), > CLKDEV_INIT("s3c64xx-spi.0", "spi_busclk0",&exynos4_clk_sclk_spi0.= clk), Yes, should be fixed. will apply. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.