From: "Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Vogel <Andreas.Vogel@anvo-it.de>
Cc: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Ideas for the future
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:23:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F58C0F2.8090404@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F54A094.1000000@anvo-it.de>
On 05.03.2012 12:16, Andreas Vogel wrote:
> if [ "feature" = unavail ] ; then
> set hidden=1
> else
> set hidden=0
> fi
> menuentry "Boot memtest86" --hidden $hidden { ... }
>
> for looks nicer opposed to
>
> if [ "feature" = unavail ] ; then
> set hidden="--hidden"
> else
> set hidden=
> fi
> menuentry "Boot memtest86" $hidden { ... }
It's a question of personal preference and I personally prefer the
second one. And even if behaviour of optional arguments is changed it
doesn't mean that we should increase bitrot by having different
interface conventions for some options.
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-05 1:13 Ideas for the future Andreas Vogel
2012-03-05 1:30 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-05 1:35 ` Samuel Thibault
2012-03-05 1:40 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-05 9:23 ` Samuel Thibault
2012-03-05 11:16 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-05 12:54 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-05 15:43 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-08 13:12 ` [BUG] GRUBs option parsing needs fixing Andreas Vogel
2012-03-08 14:15 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-08 14:32 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-08 15:03 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-08 15:18 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-08 15:28 ` Lennart Sorensen
2012-03-08 15:37 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-08 16:11 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-08 15:45 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-10 19:50 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-11 0:08 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-11 1:01 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-11 1:59 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-11 2:15 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-08 15:25 ` Lennart Sorensen
2012-03-08 15:58 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-08 15:24 ` Lennart Sorensen
2012-03-08 14:11 ` Ideas for the future Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-08 15:14 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-08 15:18 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2012-03-05 16:33 ` Andreas Vogel
2012-03-08 14:23 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F58C0F2.8090404@gmail.com \
--to=phcoder@gmail.com \
--cc=Andreas.Vogel@anvo-it.de \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.