From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S5in7-0006nX-Kk for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:14:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5in4-0006mR-It for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:14:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5in2-0002tN-Oi for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:14:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:56031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5in2-0002tB-Fr for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:14:16 -0500 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so259726eaa.0 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:14:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bvp+e2TvtaGhuM3e7UTBxgWTIEfAVry1uFDwLt7Jqi4=; b=nvNn6sHvrWHi+qbGkI9lDDDUidb5Ye7cNJaDcMqI18Nu/n0jWh18aX59fQe/AZjZ47 8goq2g2kUqobYUaKv/IIkdjuO0LwlGbk1kvMS4utxfmaAK14YGpX3mvXnjZzF99obt3S LJPk7UJFqGmjwPMAMNne8W9i/UK+eZS1WwsBD4ew7iNyN5uQSlkhu9yFTlgvdacKKVko PhwBoLnOwb2hIS0D93sNSQ7ProOebDo4XOs2Cj0xPg6cSsif1ZDYmVxJMsALWpHMHUOq o8YclW5/wwPkZDedsV7XJ4hXFFWRVv2jc1cyGvk6cA6Yhg/ffVPyNWJLBNlCj8TAKT4u dzyA== Received: by 10.14.51.207 with SMTP id b55mr2560238eec.53.1331234054269; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:14:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (95-233.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.197.233.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y11sm9326761eem.3.2012.03.08.11.14.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:14:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F590500.3040101@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 20:14:08 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: grub-probe seems to be having problems References: <20120301194758.GE22241@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4F52947C.3010500@gmail.com> <20120305200729.GE14853@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4F58F082.1090504@gmail.com> <20120308190102.GT14853@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <20120308190102.GT14853@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:14:19 -0000 On 08.03.2012 20:01, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 06:46:42PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> Yes, I've just fixed one. grub-fstest works on big-endian now. >> Couldn't test grub-probe since the Ubuntu on my PPC test machine is >> outdated. > I can certainly give it a try if it is in bzr now. It is. >> GRUB always assumes that RAID metadata is in little-endian. We don't >> have any "native-endian parsers" since we assume that grub-probe >> results are valid for GRUB runtime as well even if they run on >> different endianness. If we need any support for structures which >> can be either le or be we compile code twice, once for le, once for >> be (look at e.g. cpio code). I couldn't test the images created on >> big-endian platform due to ancient distro. > Fair enough. I'll have to download the new distro when I'm on better internet. -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko