From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5kUY-00025f-Lq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:03:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5kUE-0007Bp-Lc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:03:18 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52182 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5kUE-0007Bh-FO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:02:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4F591E7E.8050709@suse.de> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:02:54 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F582EDB.1040608@redhat.com> <4F58B5CB.8040503@codemonkey.ws> <4F58CDEA.2020506@redhat.com> <4F59010C.2060105@codemonkey.ws> <4F5909B3.4080405@redhat.com> <4F590BD7.6030605@codemonkey.ws> <4F5913F3.3040503@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5913F3.3040503@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues Cc: Ademar Reis , QEMU devel , Anthony Liguori , Cleber Rosa Am 08.03.2012 21:17, schrieb Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues: > [...] qemu-jeos points out to external > repositories, just as much as buildroot. It seems to me that the whole > point about FSF requiring the source to be under your control is no > longer valid here. As long as no binary is distributed, there's no need to keep sources around, is there? Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg