From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
balajitk@ti.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add mmc controller nodes and board data
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:56:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F59CCAF.1090806@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120309054608.647473E0901@localhost>
On Friday 09 March 2012 11:16 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:49:00 -0800, Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>> * Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com> [120223 19:29]:
>>> On Friday 24 February 2012 12:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -113,5 +113,31 @@
>>>>> #size-cells =<0>;
>>>>> ti,hwmods = "i2c3";
>>>>> };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc1: mmc@1 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc1";
>>>>> + ti,dual-volt;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc2: mmc@2 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc2";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc3: mmc@3 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc3";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc4: mmc@4 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc4";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc5: mmc@5 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc5";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> };
>>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> These all should all be "ti,omap3-hsmmc" I guess?
>>>
>>> Well, I defined the binding such that both omap2 and omap3
>>> can use the same compatible "ti,omap2-hsmmc" since there is
>>> no difference in the way they are defined or handled. If thats
>>> confusing, I can have separate compatibles.
>>> Btw, I guess we do the same with a few other re-used IPs as well,
>>> I just checked and mcpsi does the same.
>>
>> Yeah let's use separate compatibles to avoid confusion.
>> For omap2 we also have the ti,omap2-mmc in addition to
>> ti,omap2-hsmmc..
>
> Yes, absolutely use separate compatible values. It is always important
> to be specific as to the silicon implementing the IP. The omap3 instance
> can also carry the omap2 string in its compatible list:
>
> compatible = "ti,omap3-hsmmc", "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
Sure, will repost with seperate compatible strings. Also missed adding
the 'status = "disable";' for unused mmc blocks in the board .dts file
causing unused mmc modules to get probed too. Will fix that as well.
thanks,
Rajendra
>
> g.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add mmc controller nodes and board data
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:56:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F59CCAF.1090806@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120309054608.647473E0901@localhost>
On Friday 09 March 2012 11:16 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:49:00 -0800, Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>> * Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com> [120223 19:29]:
>>> On Friday 24 February 2012 12:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -113,5 +113,31 @@
>>>>> #size-cells =<0>;
>>>>> ti,hwmods = "i2c3";
>>>>> };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc1: mmc at 1 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc1";
>>>>> + ti,dual-volt;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc2: mmc at 2 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc2";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc3: mmc at 3 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc3";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc4: mmc at 4 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc4";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc5: mmc at 5 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
>>>>> + ti,hwmods = "mmc5";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> };
>>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> These all should all be "ti,omap3-hsmmc" I guess?
>>>
>>> Well, I defined the binding such that both omap2 and omap3
>>> can use the same compatible "ti,omap2-hsmmc" since there is
>>> no difference in the way they are defined or handled. If thats
>>> confusing, I can have separate compatibles.
>>> Btw, I guess we do the same with a few other re-used IPs as well,
>>> I just checked and mcpsi does the same.
>>
>> Yeah let's use separate compatibles to avoid confusion.
>> For omap2 we also have the ti,omap2-mmc in addition to
>> ti,omap2-hsmmc..
>
> Yes, absolutely use separate compatible values. It is always important
> to be specific as to the silicon implementing the IP. The omap3 instance
> can also carry the omap2 string in its compatible list:
>
> compatible = "ti,omap3-hsmmc", "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
Sure, will repost with seperate compatible strings. Also missed adding
the 'status = "disable";' for unused mmc blocks in the board .dts file
causing unused mmc modules to get probed too. Will fix that as well.
thanks,
Rajendra
>
> g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 12:01 [PATCH v2 0/4] omap hsmmc device tree support Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <1329998490-27555-1-git-send-email-rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-23 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Convert hsmmc driver to use device tree Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <1329998490-27555-2-git-send-email-rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-24 11:32 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-02-24 11:32 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-02-24 11:35 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-24 11:35 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <4F4775FF.2090500-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-24 12:51 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 12:51 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 12:58 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-24 12:58 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <4F478963.20009-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-24 13:02 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 13:02 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 13:04 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-24 13:04 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-08 3:46 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-08 3:46 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-08 15:58 ` Rob Herring
2012-03-08 15:58 ` Rob Herring
2012-03-09 5:42 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-09 5:42 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-09 9:21 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-09 9:21 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Avoid a regulator voltage change with dt Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm/dts: OMAP4: Add mmc controller nodes and board data Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-24 10:16 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-02-24 10:16 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-02-24 10:26 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-24 10:26 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <4F4765EC.1000102-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-24 10:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 10:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 10:59 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-02-24 10:59 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-03-09 15:49 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-09 15:49 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-23 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm/dts: OMAP3: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 18:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-23 18:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-24 4:00 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-24 4:00 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <4F470B71.1020308-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-24 11:23 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 11:23 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-24 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-09 5:46 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-09 5:46 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-09 6:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-09 6:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-09 9:36 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-09 9:36 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-09 9:26 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-03-09 9:26 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] omap hsmmc device tree support Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 12:13 ` Rajendra Nayak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-12 15:02 Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add mmc controller nodes and board data Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 15:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F59CCAF.1090806@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.