From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] w64: Don't redefine lseek, ftruncate
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5B7E92.5010402@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F5B44D4.5030105@suse.de>
Am 10.03.2012 13:11, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Am 10.03.2012 11:14, schrieb Stefan Weil:
>
>> MinGW-w64 already defines lseek and ftruncate (and uses the 64 bit
>> variants). The conditional compilation avoids redefinitions
>> (which would be wrong) and compiler warnings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil<sw@weilnetz.de>
>> ---
>> qemu-common.h | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qemu-common.h b/qemu-common.h
>> index dbfce6f..b0fdf5c 100644
>> --- a/qemu-common.h
>> +++ b/qemu-common.h
>> @@ -93,9 +93,13 @@ typedef int (*fprintf_function)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, ...)
>>
>> #ifdef _WIN32
>> #define fsync _commit
>> -#define lseek _lseeki64
>> +#if !defined(lseek)
>> +# define lseek _lseeki64
>> +#endif
>> int qemu_ftruncate64(int, int64_t);
>> -#define ftruncate qemu_ftruncate64
>> +#if !defined(ftruncate)
>> +# define ftruncate qemu_ftruncate64
>> +#endif
>>
> lseek looks okay to me, but did you check that ftruncate and
> qemu_ftruncate64 behave the same?
>
> Andreas
>
qemu_ftruncate64 was added in 1996. It is only used for MinGW32,
and maybe not even needed there, because it is simply a 64 bit
implementation of ftruncate. Eliminating qemu_ftruncate64
might be handled in a separate patch.
The MinGW32 and MinGW-w64 functions ftruncate64 should be sufficient,
and MinGW-w64 uses #define ftruncate ftruncate64.
Regards,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-10 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-10 10:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] w64: Don't redefine lseek, ftruncate Stefan Weil
2012-03-10 10:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Test for libiberty.a (mingw32) Stefan Weil
2012-03-10 16:28 ` Andreas Färber
2012-03-10 18:47 ` Stefan Weil
2012-03-11 16:10 ` Blue Swirl
2012-03-10 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] w64: Don't redefine lseek, ftruncate Andreas Färber
2012-03-10 16:17 ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2012-03-11 16:09 ` Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5B7E92.5010402@weilnetz.de \
--to=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.