From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:23:41 +0530 Message-ID: <4F5D8F65.7000205@ti.com> References: <1331046702-2472-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog127.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.107]:59833 "EHLO psmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752218Ab2CLFxy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:53:54 -0400 Received: by ghbz2 with SMTP id z2so2612292ghb.34 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:53:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Tero Kristo , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Saturday 10 March 2012 09:35 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > The main outstanding question is whether the OMAP4 WUCLKOUT poll should be > removed to match the v5 changes to the OMAP3 function. Please let me > know. Any other testing or comments are of course welcome. I think we should instead add it back in omap3 and keep the omap4 as is. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:23:41 +0530 Subject: [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes In-Reply-To: References: <1331046702-2472-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Message-ID: <4F5D8F65.7000205@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Saturday 10 March 2012 09:35 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > The main outstanding question is whether the OMAP4 WUCLKOUT poll should be > removed to match the v5 changes to the OMAP3 function. Please let me > know. Any other testing or comments are of course welcome. I think we should instead add it back in omap3 and keep the omap4 as is.