From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:25:23 +0530 Message-ID: <4F5D8FCB.5050501@ti.com> References: <1331046702-2472-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.209]:49966 "EHLO na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752218Ab2CLFzb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:55:31 -0400 Received: by ggcs5 with SMTP id s5so2510826ggc.2 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:55:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Tero Kristo , Vishwanath BS , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Sunday 11 March 2012 02:59 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Hi Hi Paul, > > By the way, one other thing I forgot to mention. It would be really great > if kerneldoc comments can be created for any new functions added to hwmod, > PRCM, clock, or omap_device code. The intention is to help not only > people unfamiliar with the code, but even ourselves in the future. I've > been adding these by hand on Tero's last few patch series, but at some > point I'll probably stop accepting patches without kerneldoc. Thanks for updating the kerneldoc comments this time around. Will make sure patches hence forth come with adequate documentation added. thanks, Rajendra > > > thanks, > > - Paul From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:25:23 +0530 Subject: [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes In-Reply-To: References: <1331046702-2472-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Message-ID: <4F5D8FCB.5050501@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sunday 11 March 2012 02:59 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Hi Hi Paul, > > By the way, one other thing I forgot to mention. It would be really great > if kerneldoc comments can be created for any new functions added to hwmod, > PRCM, clock, or omap_device code. The intention is to help not only > people unfamiliar with the code, but even ourselves in the future. I've > been adding these by hand on Tero's last few patch series, but at some > point I'll probably stop accepting patches without kerneldoc. Thanks for updating the kerneldoc comments this time around. Will make sure patches hence forth come with adequate documentation added. thanks, Rajendra > > > thanks, > > - Paul