From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] input: add MAX8997-haptic driver Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:31:24 +0900 Message-ID: <4F5DB45C.4050101@samsung.com> References: <4F571629.8010203@samsung.com> <20120307082900.GA20493@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:21076 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753067Ab2CLIbb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 04:31:31 -0400 In-reply-to: <20120307082900.GA20493@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com Hi Dmitry, On 03/07/2012 05:29 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Chanwoo, > > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:02:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> MAX8997 has several features in a single chip, >> This patchset supports unimplemented haptic driver of MAX8997. >> >> v2 >> - code clean and remove unnecessary code according to comment of Dmitry >> Torokhov > > Could you please tell me if the version of the patch I sent to you > worked or not? It isn't worked because it use the mutex lock in irq handler stack. so, I resend v3 patch of max8997-haptic driver after modifying it. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi