From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: Clean up of PCM spinlocks
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:24:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5F588B.40107@perex.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hboo03h01.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date 13.3.2012 11:57, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> below is a patch I posted to LKML as the follow up for the lockdep
> report from Dave Jones. It's a resurrected patch from what I worked
> on quite ago. Although this fix is suboptimal, I see no better way.
>
> If this looks OK, I'm going to queue it as a 3.4 material.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
> ===
>
> From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: pcm - Simplify linked PCM substream spinlocks
>
> The spinlocks held for PCM substreams have been always messy. For the
> better concurrent accessibility, we took always the substream's lock
> first. When substreams are linked, we need a group-wide lock, but
> this should be applied outside substream's lock. So, we unlock the
> substream's lock first, then do locks twice.
>
> This scheme is known to be problematic with lockdep. Maybe because
> the nested lock isn't marked properly, and partly because the lock and
> unlock sequences are different (A/B -> A/B).
>
> This patch tries to simplify the scheme. Instead of holding the
> substream's lock, we take the group lock always at first. A drawback
> of this is that the access to the individual substream in a same group
> won't be allowed any longer. But, the code looks much easier, and
> likely less buggy.
What do you mean by this? I noticed that you switched the behaviour for
the stream_lock():
1) self_group spinlock is used for single (non-linked) stream
- same as before
2) group.lock spinlock is used for the linked streams
- the self_group spinlock is used only in the group action
- the question is why? it seems useless, the
stream_lock() functions use the allocated group.lock
I don't think that this patch will work in the way we expect.
I believe we should use only group.lock spinlock for the linked streams
without using the self_group spinlock to make locking work like this:
stream_lock(current)
group_action(current) {
for s from all_group_substreams {
if (s != current)
stream_lock(s);
}
.... job ....
.... group substreams unlock ....
}
stream_unlock(current)
So we use only one lock per stream.
Jaroslav
>
> Note that the group lock is identical with the substream's lock
> initially before the substream is linked with others. So, in the case
> of non-linked PCM, the new code behaves exactly same as before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> ---
> include/sound/pcm.h | 12 ++++++------
> sound/core/pcm_native.c | 36 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sound/pcm.h b/include/sound/pcm.h
> index 0cf91b2..d634dcc 100644
> --- a/include/sound/pcm.h
> +++ b/include/sound/pcm.h
> @@ -531,36 +531,36 @@ static inline int snd_pcm_stream_linked(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> static inline void snd_pcm_stream_lock(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> {
> read_lock(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> - spin_lock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> + spin_lock(&substream->group->lock);
> }
>
> static inline void snd_pcm_stream_unlock(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> {
> - spin_unlock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> + spin_unlock(&substream->group->lock);
> read_unlock(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> }
>
> static inline void snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> {
> read_lock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> - spin_lock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> + spin_lock(&substream->group->lock);
> }
>
> static inline void snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> {
> - spin_unlock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> + spin_unlock(&substream->group->lock);
> read_unlock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> }
>
> #define snd_pcm_stream_lock_irqsave(substream, flags) \
> do { \
> read_lock_irqsave(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock, (flags)); \
> - spin_lock(&substream->self_group.lock); \
> + spin_lock(&substream->group->lock); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irqrestore(substream, flags) \
> do { \
> - spin_unlock(&substream->self_group.lock); \
> + spin_unlock(&substream->group->lock); \
> read_unlock_irqrestore(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock, (flags)); \
> } while (0)
>
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> index 25ed9fe..c5f28ed 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_action_group(struct action_ops *ops,
> int res = 0;
>
> snd_pcm_group_for_each_entry(s, substream) {
> - if (do_lock && s != substream)
> + if (do_lock)
> spin_lock_nested(&s->self_group.lock,
> SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> res = ops->pre_action(s, state);
> @@ -740,8 +740,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_action_group(struct action_ops *ops,
> if (do_lock) {
> /* unlock streams */
> snd_pcm_group_for_each_entry(s1, substream) {
> - if (s1 != substream)
> - spin_unlock(&s1->self_group.lock);
> + spin_unlock(&s1->self_group.lock);
> if (s1 == s) /* end */
> break;
> }
> @@ -779,13 +778,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_action(struct action_ops *ops,
> int res;
>
> if (snd_pcm_stream_linked(substream)) {
> - if (!spin_trylock(&substream->group->lock)) {
> - spin_unlock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> - spin_lock(&substream->group->lock);
> - spin_lock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> - }
> res = snd_pcm_action_group(ops, substream, state, 1);
> - spin_unlock(&substream->group->lock);
> } else {
> res = snd_pcm_action_single(ops, substream, state);
> }
> @@ -801,19 +794,13 @@ static int snd_pcm_action_lock_irq(struct action_ops *ops,
> {
> int res;
>
> - read_lock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> + snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
> if (snd_pcm_stream_linked(substream)) {
> - spin_lock(&substream->group->lock);
> - spin_lock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> res = snd_pcm_action_group(ops, substream, state, 1);
> - spin_unlock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> - spin_unlock(&substream->group->lock);
> } else {
> - spin_lock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> res = snd_pcm_action_single(ops, substream, state);
> - spin_unlock(&substream->self_group.lock);
> }
> - read_unlock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> + snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
> return res;
> }
>
> @@ -1586,12 +1573,18 @@ static int snd_pcm_link(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int fd)
> struct file *file;
> struct snd_pcm_file *pcm_file;
> struct snd_pcm_substream *substream1;
> + struct snd_pcm_group *group;
>
> file = snd_pcm_file_fd(fd);
> if (!file)
> return -EBADFD;
> pcm_file = file->private_data;
> substream1 = pcm_file->substream;
> + group = kmalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!group) {
> + res = -ENOMEM;
> + goto _nolock;
> + }
> down_write(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem);
> write_lock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> if (substream->runtime->status->state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN ||
> @@ -1604,11 +1597,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_link(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int fd)
> goto _end;
> }
> if (!snd_pcm_stream_linked(substream)) {
> - substream->group = kmalloc(sizeof(struct snd_pcm_group), GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (substream->group == NULL) {
> - res = -ENOMEM;
> - goto _end;
> - }
> + substream->group = group;
> spin_lock_init(&substream->group->lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&substream->group->substreams);
> list_add_tail(&substream->link_list, &substream->group->substreams);
> @@ -1620,7 +1609,10 @@ static int snd_pcm_link(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int fd)
> _end:
> write_unlock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock);
> up_write(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem);
> + _nolock:
> fput(file);
> + if (res < 0)
> + kfree(group);
> return res;
> }
>
--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-13 10:57 Clean up of PCM spinlocks Takashi Iwai
2012-03-13 14:24 ` Jaroslav Kysela [this message]
2012-03-13 15:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-03-13 15:16 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2012-03-13 15:23 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-03-13 15:46 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2012-03-13 16:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-03-13 19:50 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2012-03-13 20:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-03-14 9:56 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2012-03-14 11:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-03-14 11:59 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2012-03-14 13:41 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-03-14 14:20 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2012-03-14 14:33 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5F588B.40107@perex.cz \
--to=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.