From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7WFG-0002Yj-Gx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:15:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7WF9-0001SG-UV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:14:50 -0400 Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([78.47.199.172]:32961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7WF9-0001Rr-Jp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:14:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4F5F8E90.3010104@weilnetz.de> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:14:40 +0100 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F5E58BE.6040808@weilnetz.de> <4F5F7672.5080201@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5F7672.5080201@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!! List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Stefano Stabellini , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 13.03.2012 17:31, schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: > Am 13.03.2012 11:41, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: >>> Am 12.03.2012 18:06, schrieb Stefano Stabellini: >>> Maybe every maintainer can maintain a short summary of >>> what he maintains, how (s)he does it (repository, expected >>> response time, ...) in the QEMU wiki. I just added >>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/StartHere#Maintainers >>> and improved my own wiki page ("leading by example :-)"). >> >> While I understand the sentiment, I don't think duplicating >> ./MAINTAINERS on the wiki is a good idea. I suggest linking solely to >> the ./MAINTAINERS file from the wiki instead of actually listing >> people. >> >> I have not removed your edit because I wanted to see what you think=20 >> first. My intention was simply to allow (and encourage) maintainers to explain their way of working and to allow users to get this information easily. > > We already have it duplicated here: > > http://wiki.qemu.org/Features > > I'd suggest to drop that page. > > Andreas Duplicating information is not necessary of course, but it does not harm in a wiki as long as it is easy to keep the information up to date. Adding links for every maintainer on the Feature page would help. Comments and git tree could be moved to the personal page of every maintainer. I have no special preference how the maintainers should be listed in the=20 wiki, but I think they should be listed there (not only in MAINTAINERS)=20 because that allows links. I just merged the existing list of developers and the=20 maintainer list (http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/StartHere#Developers_and_Maintainer= s). Do you think that's a better and possible solution? Regards, Stefan W.