From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tabi Timur-B04825 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] ASoC: fsl: remove the fatal error checking on codec-handle Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 02:57:00 +0000 Message-ID: <4F6008FA.3040805@freescale.com> References: <1331225990-27308-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1331225990-27308-10-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <4F591B8D.8090705@freescale.com> <20120309013216.GH2499@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4F5FD706.8040209@freescale.com> <20120313234638.GY3177@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BC9103AC1 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:57:20 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20120313234638.GY3177@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Mark Brown wrote: > With this card those would just be separate CODECs. This is a binding > for a simple card. But that is insufficient for the SSI driver, which is expected to handle multiple SSIs. If you're going to document a binding for the SSI driver, then you need to document how to handle multiple SSIs. > The biggest improvement is that the SoC binding knows nothing about the > card binding at all, cards are completely separate and are free to > define any binding they choose using any number of on-SoC and off-SoC > devices. Ok, I don't understand that at all. I also don't understand why you insist on perverting my driver to support two incompatible bindings, especially since I still haven't heard an explanation as to what's wrong with the binding that I defined. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: B04825@freescale.com (Tabi Timur-B04825) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 02:57:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 09/11] ASoC: fsl: remove the fatal error checking on codec-handle In-Reply-To: <20120313234638.GY3177@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1331225990-27308-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1331225990-27308-10-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <4F591B8D.8090705@freescale.com> <20120309013216.GH2499@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4F5FD706.8040209@freescale.com> <20120313234638.GY3177@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <4F6008FA.3040805@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mark Brown wrote: > With this card those would just be separate CODECs. This is a binding > for a simple card. But that is insufficient for the SSI driver, which is expected to handle multiple SSIs. If you're going to document a binding for the SSI driver, then you need to document how to handle multiple SSIs. > The biggest improvement is that the SoC binding knows nothing about the > card binding at all, cards are completely separate and are free to > define any binding they choose using any number of on-SoC and off-SoC > devices. Ok, I don't understand that at all. I also don't understand why you insist on perverting my driver to support two incompatible bindings, especially since I still haven't heard an explanation as to what's wrong with the binding that I defined. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale