All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci: check interrupt flags in ISR again
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:39:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F604B16.606@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331659002-13743-2-git-send-email-alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>

On 13/03/12 19:16, Alexander Stein wrote:
> When using MSI it is possible that a new MSI is sent while an earlier
> MSI is currently handled. In this case SDHCI_INT_STATUS only contains
> SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE and the ISR would not be called again. But at the end
> of the ISR SDHCI_INT_DATA_END is now also pending which would be ignored.
> 
> Fix this by rereading the interrupt flags in the ISR until no interrupt
> we care is pending.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 8d66706..654ab32 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2268,6 +2268,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	irqreturn_t result;
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = dev_id;
>  	u32 intmask;
> +	u32 intmask_unhandled;
>  	int cardint = 0;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&host->lock);
> @@ -2286,6 +2287,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +again:
>  	DBG("*** %s got interrupt: 0x%08x\n",
>  		mmc_hostname(host->mmc), intmask);
>  
> @@ -2336,6 +2338,14 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  		sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_INT_BUS_POWER, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
>  	}
>  
> +	intmask_unhandled = intmask;
> +
> +	intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> +
> +	/* Do interrupt handling again if we got new flags */
> +	if (intmask & ~intmask_unhandled)
> +		goto again;
> +
>  	intmask &= ~SDHCI_INT_BUS_POWER;
>  
>  	if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT)

Why not just replace mmiowb() i.e.


diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 8d66706..da8a101 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2353,7 +2353,9 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)

        result = IRQ_HANDLED;

-       mmiowb();
+       intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
+       if (intmask)
+               goto again;
 out:
        spin_unlock(&host->lock);


But maybe it would be safer limiting the number of loops i.e.


diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 8d66706..d88247d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
        irqreturn_t result;
        struct sdhci_host *host = dev_id;
        u32 intmask;
-       int cardint = 0;
+       int cardint = 0, max_loops = 16;

        spin_lock(&host->lock);

@@ -2353,7 +2353,9 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)

        result = IRQ_HANDLED;

-       mmiowb();
+       intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
+       if (intmask && --max_loops)
+               goto again;
 out:
        spin_unlock(&host->lock);

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-14  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-13 17:16 [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add MSI support Alexander Stein
2012-03-13 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci: check interrupt flags in ISR again Alexander Stein
2012-03-14  7:39   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2012-03-14  7:53     ` Alexander Stein
2012-03-14  8:13       ` Adrian Hunter
2012-03-14  8:52         ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Stein
2012-03-14  9:23           ` Adrian Hunter
2012-03-13 17:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: allow 8-bit bus width for Intel PCH Alexander Stein
2012-03-13 17:25   ` Greg KH
2012-03-14  7:38     ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Stein
2012-03-14  1:17   ` [PATCH 3/3] " Tomoya MORINAGA
2012-03-14  7:26     ` Alexander Stein
2012-03-16  3:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add MSI support Chris Ball

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F604B16.606@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.