All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] package_rpm: Add srpm function to this bbclass
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:27:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F608EA4.3070708@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F5FD730.6060705@linux.intel.com>

Hi Saul,

Thanks for your detailed comment
On 2012年03月14日 07:24, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 05:52 AM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
>> From: Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>>
>> Add a new function to archive source, patches and logs to a source rpm
>> package. Every source rpm package will be deployed to
>> ${DEPLOY_DIR}/sources/deploy-srpm.
>>
>> [YOCTO #1977]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 63 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass 
>> b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
>> index 68313ec..b261a0e 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ RPM="rpm"
>> RPMBUILD="rpmbuild"
>>
>> PKGWRITEDIRRPM = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-rpms"
>> +PKGWRITEDIRSRPM = "${DEPLOY_DIR}/sources/deploy-srpm"
>>
>> python package_rpm_fn () {
>> d.setVar('PKGFN', d.getVar('PKG'))
>> @@ -475,6 +476,37 @@ python write_specfile () {
>> import textwrap
>> import oe.packagedata
>>
>> + # append information for logs and patches to %prep
>> + def add_prep(d,spec_files_bottom):
>> + if d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True) and 
>> d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True).upper() == 'SRPM':
>> + spec_files_bottom.append('%%prep -n %s' % d.getVar('PN', True) )
>> + spec_files_bottom.append('%s' % "echo \"include logs and patches, 
>> Please check them in SOURCES\"")
>> + spec_files_bottom.append('')
>> +
>> + # get the name of tarball for sources, patches and logs
>> + def get_tarballs(d):
>> + if d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True) and 
>> d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True).upper() == 'SRPM':
>> + sourcelist=[]
>> + workdir = d.getVar('WORKDIR',True)
>> + print os.listdir(workdir)
>> + for source in os.listdir(workdir):
>> + if 'tar.gz' in source:
>> + sourcelist.append(source)
>> + return sourcelist
>
> What happens here is there are some other tar.gz file in the WORKDIR? 
> Is there a way to ensure you just get the tarballs you are looking for?
It is reasonable for your query. I need add more information to select 
the tarballs srpm wants instead of all.
>> +
>> + # append the name of tarball to key word 'SOURCE' in xxx.spec.
>> + def tail_source(d,source_list=[],patch_list=None):
>> + if d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True) and 
>> d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True).upper() == 'SRPM':
>> + source_number = 0
>> + patch_number = 0
>> + for source in source_list:
>> + spec_preamble_top.append('Source' + str(source_number) + ': %s' % 
>> source)
>> + source_number += 1
>> + if patch_list:
>> + for patch in patch_list:
>> + print_deps(patch, "Patch" + str(patch_number), spec_preamble_top, d)
>> + patch_number += 1
>> +
>> # We need a simple way to remove the MLPREFIX from the package name,
>> # and dependency information...
>> def strip_multilib(name, d):
>> @@ -707,6 +739,8 @@ python write_specfile () {
>> spec_preamble_bottom.append('License: %s' % splitlicense)
>> spec_preamble_bottom.append('Group: %s' % splitsection)
>>
>> + source_list = get_tarballs(d)
>> + tail_source(d,source_list,None)
>> # Replaces == Obsoletes&& Provides
>> if splitrreplaces and splitrreplaces.strip() != "":
>> for dep in splitrreplaces.split(','):
>> @@ -786,6 +820,7 @@ python write_specfile () {
>> del localdata
>> bb.utils.unlockfile(lf)
>>
>> + add_prep(d,spec_files_bottom)
>> spec_preamble_top.append('Summary: %s' % srcsummary)
>> spec_preamble_top.append('Name: %s' % srcname)
>> spec_preamble_top.append('Version: %s' % srcversion)
>> @@ -900,6 +935,25 @@ python write_specfile () {
>> python do_package_rpm () {
>> import os
>>
>> + def creat_srpm_dir(d):
>> + if d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True) and 
>> d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True).upper() == 'SRPM':
>> + licenses = d.getVar('LICENSE', 1).replace('&', '|')
>> + licenses = licenses.replace('(', '').replace(')', '')
>> + clean_licenses = ""
>> + for x in licenses.split():
>> + if x.strip() == '' or x == 'CLOSED':
> What about "Proprietary"
the purpose of doing this is for using licenses as a directory. So I 
think x == 'CLOSED' should be removed instead of adding this case. So 
Proprietary does.
>> + continue
>> + if x != "|":
>> + clean_licenses += x
>> + if '|' in clean_licenses:
>> + clean_licenses = clean_licenses.replace('|','')
>> +
> Maybe this spinet should be a function in license.bbclass? Maybe it's 
> there already, or is this too RPM specific?
>
if 'I' is a part of words from licenses, we should replace it. for 
example, this case happen in LICENSE = "Artistic|GPL" from perl_5.14.2.bb
>> + pkgwritesrpmdir = 
>> bb.data.expand('${PKGWRITEDIRSRPM}/${PACKAGE_ARCH_EXTEND}', d)
>> + pkgwritesrpmdir = pkgwritesrpmdir + '/' + clean_licenses
>> + bb.mkdirhier(pkgwritesrpmdir)
>> + os.chmod(pkgwritesrpmdir, 0755)
>> + return pkgwritesrpmdir
>> +
>> # We need a simple way to remove the MLPREFIX from the package name,
>> # and dependency information...
>> def strip_multilib(name, d):
>> @@ -1015,8 +1069,17 @@ python do_package_rpm () {
>> cmd = cmd + " --define 'debug_package %{nil}'"
>> cmd = cmd + " --define '_rpmfc_magic_path " + magicfile + "'"
>> cmd = cmd + " --define '_tmppath " + workdir + "'"
>> + if d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True) and 
>> d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True).upper() == 'SRPM':
>> + cmdsrpm = cmd + " --define '_sourcedir " + workdir + "' --define 
>> '_srcrpmdir " + creat_srpm_dir(d) + "'"
>> + cmdsrpm = 'fakeroot ' + cmdsrpm + " -bs " + outspecfile
>> cmd = cmd + " -bb " + outspecfile
>>
>> + # Build the source rpm package !
>> + if d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True) and 
>> d.getVar('SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE', True).upper() == 'SRPM':
>> + d.setVar('SBUILDSPEC', cmdsrpm + "\n")
>> + d.setVarFlag('SBUILDSPEC', 'func', '1')
>> + bb.build.exec_func('SBUILDSPEC', d)
>> +
>> # Build the rpm package!
>> d.setVar('BUILDSPEC', cmd + "\n")
>> d.setVarFlag('BUILDSPEC', 'func', '1')
>




  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-14 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-13 12:52 [PATCH 0/7] Realize archiving functions Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] package_rpm: Add srpm function to this bbclass Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-13 23:24   ` Saul Wold
2012-03-14 12:27     ` Xiaofeng Yan [this message]
2012-03-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] archiver.bbclass: New bbclass for archiving sources, patches, logs and scripts Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-14  2:57   ` Saul Wold
2012-03-14 12:30     ` Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] archive-patched-source.bbclass: Archive patched source Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] archive-configured-source.bbclass: Archive configured source Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] archive-original-source.bbclass: Archive original source Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] local.conf.sample: Add set for archiving packages Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-14  2:57   ` Saul Wold
2012-03-14  5:37     ` Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 7/7] sourcepkg, src_distribute, src_distribute_local: remove three bbclass Xiaofeng Yan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-16  6:23 [PATCH 0/7] Realize archiving functions Xiaofeng Yan
2012-03-16  6:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] package_rpm: Add srpm function to this bbclass Xiaofeng Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F608EA4.3070708@windriver.com \
    --to=xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.